Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy

被引:114
作者
Kohli, N [1 ]
Walsh, PM [1 ]
Roat, TW [1 ]
Karram, MM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Good Samaritan Hosp, Sch Med, Div Urogynecol & Reconstruct Pelv Surg, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00330-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To report our experience with erosion of permanent suture or mesh material after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy by the same surgeon over 8 years. Demographic data, operative notes, hospital records, and office charts were reviewed after sacrocolpopexy. Patients with erosion of either suture or mesh were treated initially with conservative therapy followed by surgical intervention as required. Results: Fifty-seven patients underwent sacrocolpopexy using synthetic mesh during the study period. The mean (range) postoperative follow-up was 19.9 (1.3-50) months. Seven patients (12%) had erosions after abdominal sacrocolpopexy with two suture erosions and five mesh erosions. Patients with suture erosion were asymptomatic compared with patients with mesh erosion, who presented with vaginal bleeding or discharge. The mean (+/- standard deviation) time to erosion was 14.0 +/- 7.7 (range 4-24) months. Both patients with suture erosion were treated conservatively with estrogen cream. All five patients with mesh erosion required transvaginal removal of the mesh. Conclusion: Mesh erosion can follow abdominal sacrocolpopexy over a long time, and usually presents as vaginal bleeding or discharge. Although patients with suture erosion can be managed successfully with conservative treatment, patients with mesh erosion require surgical intervention. Transvaginal removal of the mesh with vaginal advancement appears to be an effective treatment in patients failing conservative management. (Obstet Gynecol 1998;92: 999-1004. (C) 1998 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1004
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]  
MARION GM, 1909, REV GYNECOL CHIR ABD, V13, P465
[13]   SACROSPINOUS FIXATION FOR MASSIVE EVERSION OF THE VAGINA [J].
NICHOLS, DH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 142 (07) :901-904
[14]   USE OF DERMAL GRAFT IN THE SURGICAL REPAIR OF VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE [J].
PELOSI, MA ;
APUZZIO, J ;
GOWDA, V ;
PATEL, RC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 55 (03) :385-388
[15]  
Richardson AC., 1995, J PELVIC SURG, V1, P214
[16]   COMPOSITE VAGINAL VAULT SUSPENSION USING FASCIA LATA [J].
RIDLEY, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 126 (05) :590-596
[17]  
SNYDER TE, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P944
[18]  
TIMMONS MC, 1992, J REPROD MED, V37, P323
[19]  
TIMMONS MC, 1996, OPER TECH GYNECOL SU, V1, P92
[20]  
TIMMONS MC, 1997, J PELVIC SURG, V3, P75