Complication Rates After TRUS Guided Transrectal Systematic and MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsies in a High-Risk Region for Antibiotic Resistances

被引:12
作者
Wenzel, Mike [1 ]
Theissen, Lena [1 ]
Preisser, Felix [1 ]
Lauer, Benedikt [2 ]
Wittler, Clarissa [1 ]
Humke, Clara [1 ]
Bodelle, Boris [3 ]
Ilievski, Valentina [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kempf, Volkhard A. J. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kluth, Luis A. [1 ]
Chun, Felix K. H. [1 ]
Mandel, Philipp [1 ]
Becker, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Urol, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Radiol, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Inst Med Microbiol & Infect Control, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Univ Ctr Infect Dis, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Univ Ctr Competence Infect Control State Hesse, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2020年 / 7卷
关键词
transrectal prostate biopsy; complications; systematic biopsy; targeted biopsy; infection; biopsy naive; repeat biopsy; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; CANCER; MULTICENTER; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2020.00007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: There is still an ongoing debate whether a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) approach for prostate biopsies is associated with higher (infectious) complications rates compared to transperineal biopsies. This is especially of great interests in settings with elevated frequencies of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO). Materials and Methods: Between 01/2018 and 05/2019 230 patients underwent a TRUS-guided prostate biopsy at the department of Urology at University Hospital Frankfurt. Patients were followed up within the clinical routine that was not conducted earlier than 6 weeks after the biopsy. Among 230 biopsies, 180 patients took part in the follow-up. No patients were excluded. Patients were analyzed retrospectively regarding complications, infections and underlying infectious agents or needed interventions. Results: Of all patients with follow up, 84 patients underwent a systematic biopsy (SB) and 96 a targeted biopsy (TB) after MRI of the prostate with additional SB. 74.8% of the patients were biopsy-naive. The most frequent objective complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo) lasting longer than one day after biopsy were hematuria (17.9%, n = 32), hematospermia (13.9%, n = 25), rectal bleeding (2.8%, n = 5), and pain (2.2%, n = 4). Besides a known high MDRO prevalence in the Rhine-Main region, only one patient (0.6%) developed fever after biopsy. One patient each (0.6%) consulted a physician due to urinary retention, rectal bleeding or gross hematuria. There were no significant differences in complications seen between SB and SB + TB patients. The rate of patients who consulted a physician was significantly higher for patients with one or more prior biopsies compared to biopsy-naive patients. Conclusion: Complications after transrectal prostate biopsies are rare and often self-limiting. Infections were seen in <1% of all patients, regardless of an elevated local prevalence of MDROs. Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo >= IIIa) were only seen in 3 (1.7%) of the patients. Repeated biopsy is associated with higher complication rates in general.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores
    Berger, AP
    Gozzi, C
    Steiner, H
    Frauscher, F
    Varkarakis, J
    Rogatsch, H
    Bartsch, G
    Horninger, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04) : 1478 - 1480
  • [2] Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy
    Borghesi, Marco
    Ahmed, Hashim
    Nam, Robert
    Schaeffer, Edward
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Taneja, Samir
    Weidner, Wolfgang
    Loeb, Stacy
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (03) : 353 - 365
  • [3] Prosbiotate: A Multicenter, Prospective Analysis of Infectious Complications after Prostate Biopsy
    Bruyere, Franck
    Malavaud, Sandra
    Bertrand, Philippe
    Decock, Aliette
    Cariou, Gerard
    Doublet, Jean Dominique
    Bernard, Louis
    Bugel, Hubert
    Conquy, Sophie
    Sotto, Albert
    Boiteux, Jean Paul
    Pogu, Bertrand
    Rebillard, Xavier
    Mongiat-Artus, Pierre
    Coloby, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (01) : 145 - 150
  • [4] Should warfarin or aspirin be stopped prior to prostate biopsy? An analysis of bleeding complications related to increasing sample number regimes
    Chowdhury, R.
    Abbas, A.
    Idriz, S.
    Hoy, A.
    Rutherford, E. E.
    Smart, J. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (12) : E64 - E70
  • [5] Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Osses, Daniel
    Nieboer, Daan
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (01) : 78 - 94
  • [6] Identification of 23 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci using the iCOGS custom genotyping array
    Eeles, Rosalind A.
    Al Olama, Ali Amin
    Benlloch, Sara
    Saunders, Edward J.
    Leongamornlert, Daniel A.
    Tymrakiewicz, Malgorzata
    Ghoussaini, Maya
    Luccarini, Craig
    Dennis, Joe
    Jugurnauth-Little, Sarah
    Dadaev, Tokhir
    Neal, David E.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    Muir, Ken
    Giles, Graham G.
    Severi, Gianluca
    Wiklund, Fredrik
    Gronberg, Henrik
    Haiman, Christopher A.
    Schumacher, Fredrick
    Henderson, Brian E.
    Le Marchand, Loic
    Lindstrom, Sara
    Kraft, Peter
    Hunter, David J.
    Gapstur, Susan
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Berndt, Sonja I.
    Albanes, Demetrius
    Andriole, Gerald
    Schleutker, Johanna
    Weischer, Maren
    Canzian, Federico
    Riboli, Elio
    Key, Tim J.
    Travis, Ruth C.
    Campa, Daniele
    Ingles, Sue A.
    John, Esther M.
    Hayes, Richard B.
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    Pashayan, Nora
    Khaw, Kay-Tee
    Stanford, Janet L.
    Ostrander, Elaine A.
    Signorello, Lisa B.
    Thibodeau, Stephen N.
    Schaid, Dan
    Maier, Christiane
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2013, 45 (04) : 385 - 391
  • [7] The Impact of Repeat Biopsies on Infectious Complications in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Vertosick, Emily
    Spaliviero, Massimiliano
    Giallo-Uvino, Anna
    Taur, Ying
    O'Sullivan, Maryellen
    Livingston, Jennifer
    Sogani, Pramod
    Eastham, James
    Scardino, Peter
    Touijer, Karim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (03) : 660 - 664
  • [8] Bleeding after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: a study of 7-day morbidity after a six-, eight- and 12-core biopsy protocol
    Ghani, KR
    Dundas, D
    Patel, U
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (07) : 1014 - 1020
  • [9] Multidrug-resistant bacteria in geriatric clinics, nursing homes, and ambulant care - Prevalence and risk factors
    Gruber, Isabella
    Heudorf, Ursel
    Werner, Guido
    Pfeifer, Yvonne
    Imirzalioglu, Can
    Ackermann, Hanns
    Brandt, Christian
    Besier, Lke
    Wichelhaus, Thomas A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 303 (08) : 405 - 409
  • [10] MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
    Kasivisvanathan, V
    Rannikko, A. S.
    Borghi, M.
    Panebianco, V
    Mynderse, L. A.
    Vaarala, M. H.
    Briganti, A.
    Budaus, L.
    Hellawell, G.
    Hindley, R. G.
    Roobol, M. J.
    Eggener, S.
    Ghei, M.
    Villers, A.
    Bladou, F.
    Villeirs, G. M.
    Virdi, J.
    Boxler, S.
    Robert, G.
    Singh, P. B.
    Venderink, W.
    Hadaschik, B. A.
    Ruffion, A.
    Hu, J. C.
    Margolis, D.
    Crouzet, S.
    Klotz, L.
    Taneja, S. S.
    Pinto, P.
    Gill, I
    Allen, C.
    Giganti, F.
    Freeman, A.
    Morris, S.
    Punwani, S.
    Williams, N. R.
    Brew-Graves, C.
    Deeks, J.
    Takwoingi, Y.
    Emberton, M.
    Moore, C. M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (19) : 1767 - 1777