Individual Differences for Self-Regulating Task-Oriented Reading Activities

被引:92
作者
Vidal Abarca, Eduardo [1 ]
Mana, Amelia [1 ]
Gil, Laura [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Dept Educ Psychol, Valencia 46010, Spain
[2] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Dept Educ Psychol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
self regulation; reading comprehension; individual differences; monitoring comprehension; METACOMPREHENSION ACCURACY; LOCATING INFORMATION; TEXT COMPREHENSION; JUDGMENTS; DOCUMENTS; IMPROVE; ABILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1037/a0020062
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The goal of this study is to analyze the self regulation processes present in task oriented reading activities In the 1st experiment we examined the following self regulation processes in the context of answering questions about an available text (a) monitoring the comprehension of the question (b) self regulating the search process and (c) monitoring the decision to search Skilled and less skilled comprehenders from 7th and 8th grades read 2 texts and answered 16 questions while all their actions were recorded on a computer We hypothesized that skilled comprehenders would differ from less skilled comprehenders on the 1st 2 processes on the basis of their general comprehension skills but that their superiority in the 3rd process would be based on specific characteristics of the interaction between the reader and the text The results support our hypotheses In the 2nd experiment we hypothesized that monitoring the decision to search would be equivalent to judgments of learning (JOLs) Eighth graders made JOLs before answering every question and then they decided whether to search the text Our hypothesis was confirmed Our study reveals that task oriented reading places specific demands on readers related to metacognitive monitoring
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 826
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ABARCA EV, 2007, TEC TEST ESTRATEGIAS
[2]  
AZEVEDO R, 2007, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V2, P57
[3]   Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text [J].
Cataldo, MG ;
Oakhill, J .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 92 (04) :791-799
[4]   The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents [J].
Cerdan, Raquel ;
Vidal-Abarca, Eduardo .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 100 (01) :209-222
[5]   Why does rereading improve metacomprehension accuracy? Evaluating the levels-of-disruption hypothesis for the rereading effect [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Rawson, KA .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2005, 40 (01) :37-55
[6]   What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Rawson, KA ;
Middleton, EL .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 52 (04) :551-565
[7]  
Dunlosky J, 2002, PSYCHOLOGY OF SCIENCE TEXT COMPREHENSION, P255
[8]   Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Lipko, Amanda R. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (04) :228-232
[9]  
Glover J.A., 1989, EDUC RES QUART, V13, P7
[10]   CONSTRUCTING INFERENCES DURING NARRATIVE TEXT COMPREHENSION [J].
GRAESSER, AC ;
SINGER, M ;
TRABASSO, T .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1994, 101 (03) :371-395