Mapping causal circuit dynamics in stroke using simultaneous electroencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:11
作者
Rolle, Camarin E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baumer, Fiona M. [2 ,4 ]
Jordan, Joshua T. [5 ]
Berry, Ketura [6 ]
Garcia, Madelleine [4 ]
Monusko, Karen [1 ]
Trivedi, Hersh [1 ]
Wu, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Toll, Russell [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Buckwalter, Marion S. [4 ,7 ]
Lansberg, Maarten [4 ]
Etkin, Amit [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Sch Med, 401 Quarry Rd,MC 5797, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Wu Tsai Neurosci Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Palo Alto Vet Hlth Care Adm, Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurol Sci, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Stroke; TMS-EEG; Connectivity; Motor cortex; Beta; wPLI; CONTRALESIONAL MOTOR CORTEX; INTERHEMISPHERIC INTERACTIONS; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; PREMOTOR CORTEX; HAND MOVEMENTS; EEG; TMS; RECOVERY; BRAIN; CONNECTIVITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-021-02319-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Motor impairment after stroke is due not only to direct tissue loss but also to disrupted connectivity within the motor network. Mixed results from studies attempting to enhance motor recovery with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) highlight the need for a better understanding of both connectivity after stroke and the impact of TMS on this connectivity. This study used TMS-EEG to map the causal information flow in the motor network of healthy adult subjects and define how stroke alters these circuits. Methods Fourteen stroke patients and 12 controls received TMS to two sites (bilateral primary motor cortices) during two motor tasks (paretic/dominant hand movement vs. rest) while EEG measured the cortical response to TMS pulses. TMS-EEG based connectivity measurements were derived for each hemisphere and the change in connectivity (Delta C) between the two motor tasks was calculated. We analyzed if Delta C for each hemisphere differed between the stroke and control groups or across TMS sites, and whether Delta C correlated with arm function in stroke patients. Results Right hand movement increased connectivity in the left compared to the right hemisphere in controls, while hand movement did not significantly change connectivity in either hemisphere in stroke. Stroke patients with the largest increase in healthy hemisphere connectivity during paretic hand movement had the best arm function. Conclusions TMS-EEG measurements are sensitive to movement-induced changes in brain connectivity. These measurements may characterize clinically meaningful changes in circuit dynamics after stroke, thus providing specific targets for trials of TMS in post-stroke rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Hoyer, Erik H. ;
Celnik, Pablo A. .
RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 29 (06) :395-409
[32]   Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as neuromodulatory techniques in stroke rehabilitation [J].
Fuentes Calderon, Maria Antonia ;
Olmedo Jimenez, Laura ;
Sanchez Ledesma, Maria Jose .
SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING MULTICULTURALITY (TEEM'18), 2018, :422-427
[33]   Evoked EEG Mapping during Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation [J].
Sato, Hideyuki ;
Ge, Sheng ;
Iramina, Keiji ;
Ueno, Shoogo .
WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2006, VOL 14, PTS 1-6, 2007, 14 :2789-+
[34]   The novelty value of the combined use of electroencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuroscience research [J].
Komssi, Soile ;
Kahkonen, Seppo .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2006, 52 (01) :183-192
[35]   Mapping Brain Motor Functions Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with a Volume Conductor Model and Electrophysiological Experiments [J].
Hikita, Keigo ;
Gomez-Tames, Jose ;
Hirata, Akimasa .
BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (01)
[36]   Direct Causal Networks for the Study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects on Focal Epileptiform Discharges [J].
Kugiumtzis, Dimitris ;
Kimiskidis, Vasilios K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 25 (05)
[37]   Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials [J].
Julkunen, Petro ;
Saisanen, Laura ;
Danner, Nils ;
Niskanen, Eini ;
Hukkanen, Taina ;
Mervaala, Esa ;
Kononen, Mervi .
NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 44 (03) :790-795
[38]   The Current and Future Potential of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Electroencephalography in Psychiatry [J].
Hui, Jeanette ;
Tremblay, Sara ;
Daskalakis, Zafiris J. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 106 (04) :734-746
[39]   Reliability and Validity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Biomarkers [J].
Parmigiani, Sara ;
Ross, Jessica M. ;
Cline, Christopher C. ;
Minasi, Christopher B. ;
Gogulski, Juha ;
Keller, Corey J. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY-COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING, 2023, 8 (08) :805-814