Measurement of fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review

被引:90
作者
不详
机构
[1] Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Vancouver, BC
[2] University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
[3] Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
[4] Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
[5] Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
[6] NIH, NIDCR, Bethesda, MD
[7] University of Maryland, College Park, MD
[8] Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
[9] New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA
[10] European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris
[11] Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
[12] Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L7
来源
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH | 2007年 / 57卷 / 08期
关键词
systemic lupus erythematosus; fatigue; Fatigue Severity Scale; Systemic Lupus Activity Measure; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index;
D O I
10.1002/art.23113
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To systematically review fatigue instruments used in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to seek consensus on which instruments should be recommended for future studies and which data on comorbid conditions should be reported when evaluating fatigue in patients with SLE. Methods. We used data from Medline and EMBase databases (from January 1970 to June 2006), clinical experts, and bibliographies. Data were extracted independently by 4 authors and reviewed by a working group and larger expert panel to produce a recommendation. Instruments were examined for construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change. Correlations between fatigue and some components of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), disease activity, and comorbidities were reviewed. Results. We identified 34 studies that used 15 fatigue instruments in patients with SLE. The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used in 56% of the studies. The Systemic Lupus Activity Measure was significantly correlated with fatigue, but the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index was not. Fatigue was also correlated with pain, poor quality of sleep, depression, and with each subscale of the SF-36. Conclusion. The working group and expert panel recommend the 9-item FSS for evaluating fatigue in SLE patients. Responsiveness to change of fatigue instruments has not been well established in SLE and needs further study. The panel suggested that an important improvement or response could be a 15% decrease in the FSS. The effect of several important confounding factors of fatigue such as sleep disorders, depression, fibromyalgia, and anemia needs to be collected and reported.
引用
收藏
页码:1348 / 1357
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Austin JS, 1996, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V9, P391, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199610)9:5<391::AID-ANR1790090508>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-V
[3]  
Beck AT, 1987, BECK DEPRESSION INVE
[4]  
BELZA BL, 1993, NURS RES, V42, P93
[5]   DERIVATION OF THE SLEDAI - A DISEASE-ACTIVITY INDEX FOR LUPUS PATIENTS [J].
BOMBARDIER, C ;
GLADMAN, DD ;
UROWITZ, MB ;
CARON, D ;
CHANG, CH .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1992, 35 (06) :630-640
[6]   Measurement of fatigue and discomfort in primary Sjogren's syndrome using a new questionnaire tool [J].
Bowman, SJ ;
Booth, DA ;
Platts, RG .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 43 (06) :758-764
[7]   Factors associated with fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [J].
Bruce, IN ;
Mak, VC ;
Hallett, DC ;
Gladman, DD ;
Urowitz, MB .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1999, 58 (06) :379-381
[8]   THE PITTSBURGH SLEEP QUALITY INDEX - A NEW INSTRUMENT FOR PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE AND RESEARCH [J].
BUYSSE, DJ ;
REYNOLDS, CF ;
MONK, TH ;
BERMAN, SR ;
KUPFER, DJ .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1989, 28 (02) :193-213
[9]   DEVELOPMENT OF A FATIGUE SCALE [J].
CHALDER, T ;
BERELOWITZ, G ;
PAWLIKOWSKA, T ;
WATTS, L ;
WESSELY, S ;
WRIGHT, D ;
WALLACE, EP .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1993, 37 (02) :147-153
[10]   HEpiMA:: software for the identification of heterogeneity in meta-analysis [J].
Costa-Bouzas, J ;
Takkouche, B ;
Cadarso-Suárez, C ;
Spiegelman, D .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2001, 64 (02) :101-107