Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods

被引:3110
作者
Callaway, Brantly [1 ]
Sant'Anna, Pedro H. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Econ, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Econ, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
Difference-in-Differences; Dynamic treatment effects; Doubly robust; Event study; Variation in treatment timing; Treatment effect heterogeneity; Semi-parametric; FAST-FOOD INDUSTRY; CAUSAL INFERENCE; MINIMUM-WAGE; SEMIPARAMETRIC EFFICIENCY; MOMENT RESTRICTIONS; NEW-JERSEY; MODELS; EMPLOYMENT; IDENTIFICATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, we consider identification, estimation, and inference procedures for treatment effect parameters using Difference-in-Differences (DiD) with (i) multiple time periods, (ii) variation in treatment timing, and (iii) when the "parallel trends assumption" holds potentially only after conditioning on observed covariates. We show that a family of causal effect parameters are identified in staggered DiD setups, even if differences in observed characteristics create non-parallel outcome dynamics between groups. Our identification results allow one to use outcome regression, inverse prob-ability weighting, or doubly-robust estimands. We also propose different aggregation schemes that can be used to highlight treatment effect heterogeneity across different dimensions as well as to summarize the overall effect of participating in the treatment. We establish the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators and prove the validity of a computationally convenient bootstrap procedure to conduct asymptotically valid simultaneous (instead of pointwise) inference. Finally, we illustrate the relevance of our proposed tools by analyzing the effect of the minimum wage on teen employment from 2001-2007. Open-source software is available for implementing the proposed methods. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 230
页数:31
相关论文
共 79 条
[11]   The War on Poverty's Experiment in Public Medicine: Community Health Centers and the Mortality of Older Americans [J].
Bailey, Martha J. ;
Goodman-Bacon, Andrew .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (03) :1067-1104
[12]   PROGRAM EVALUATION AND CAUSAL INFERENCE WITH HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA [J].
Belloni, A. ;
Chernozhukov, V. ;
Fernandez-Val, I. ;
Hansen, C. .
ECONOMETRICA, 2017, 85 (01) :233-298
[13]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[14]  
BOJINOV I., 2020, PANEL EXPT DYNAMIC C
[15]   RECOVERING DISTRIBUTIONS IN DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCES MODELS: A COMPARISON OF SELECTIVE AND COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOLING [J].
Bonhomme, Stephane ;
Sauder, Ulrich .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2011, 93 (02) :479-494
[16]  
Borusyak K., 2018, REVISITING EVE UNPUB, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2826228
[17]   Difference-in-differences when the treatment status is observed in only one period [J].
Botosaru, Irene ;
Gutierrez, Federico H. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2018, 33 (01) :73-90
[18]   NEW EVIDENCE ON THE FINITE SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF PROPENSITY SCORE REWEIGHTING AND MATCHING ESTIMATORS [J].
Busso, Matias ;
DiNardo, John ;
McCrary, Justin .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2014, 96 (05) :885-897
[19]   Quantile treatment effects in difference in differences models under dependence restrictions and with only two time periods [J].
Callaway, Brantly ;
Li, Tong ;
Oka, Tatsushi .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2018, 206 (02) :395-413
[20]  
CARD D, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P772