Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalyst: Comparison between comprehensive kinetic modeling, Artificial Neural Network, and a novel hybrid GA-Fuzzy models

被引:15
作者
Hosein, Mohammad [1 ]
Ahmadi, Eghbal [1 ]
Mosayebi, Amir [1 ]
机构
[1] Tafresh Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Tafresh 3951879611, Iran
关键词
Mamdani Fuzzy Inference; Artificial Neural Network (ANN); Kinetic model; Genetic Algorithm (GA); Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; Co-Ni/Al2O3; catalyst; NI-PD/AL2O3; CATALYST; PARTIAL OXIDATION; COMBINED STEAM; METHANE; SYSTEMS; CO; OPTIMIZATION; ANN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtice.2021.07.041
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Background: Fischer - Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is a direct route for producing liquid fuels. Methods: To predict the behavior of FTS over Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalyst, three different models including a novel hybrid GA-Fuzzy model, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model, and a comprehensive kinetic model were developed. The models' outputs were CO conversion and the selectivity of CH4 and C-5(+), whereas the models' inputs were pressure, H-2/CO ratio, temperature, and GHSV. For the GA-Fuzzy model, a novel technique was developed to optimize the qualitative definition of input/output variables along with the fuzzy rules to improve the model performance. For the ANN model, an optimum two-layer neural network was developed. For the kinetic model (derived based on Langmuir-Freundlich technique), the elementary reactions were suggested based on alkyl mechanism and included re-adsorption and hydrogenation on the secondary active sites of the catalyst. Significant Findings: The models' prediction errors were 8.27%, 4.59%, and 12.56% for GA-Fuzzy, ANN, and kinetic models, respectively. The GA-Fuzzy model had higher interpretability, transparency, and generality compared to the ANN model. Besides, the kinetic model provided a more realistic representation of the reactor behavior. The optimized operating conditions of the reactor were also found, which were 240 degrees C, 24 bar, 1233.78 h(-1) for GHSV, and 2.5 for H-2/CO ratio. (C) 2021 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 45
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   A historical review of evolutionary learning methods for Mamdani-type fuzzy rule-based systems: Designing interpretable genetic fuzzy systems [J].
Cordon, Oscar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2011, 52 (06) :894-913
[12]   Pyrolysis of Low Density Polyethylene: Kinetic Study Using TGA Data and ANN Prediction [J].
Dubdub, Ibrahim ;
Al-Yaari, Mohammed .
POLYMERS, 2020, 12 (04)
[13]   Fault detection and diagnosis for reactive distillation based on convolutional neural network [J].
Ge, Xiaolong ;
Wang, Beibei ;
Yang, Xinchuang ;
Pan, Yu ;
Liu, Botan ;
Liu, Botong .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 145
[14]   A dynamic fuzzy model for a drum-boiler-turbine system [J].
Habbi, H ;
Zelmat, M ;
Bouamama, BO .
AUTOMATICA, 2003, 39 (07) :1213-1219
[15]   Kinetic modeling of the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis in a slurry phase bubble column reactor using Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm [J].
Haghtalab, A. ;
Nabipoor, M. ;
Farzad, S. .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 104 :73-79
[16]   Experimental and kinetic modeling of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over nano structure catalyst of Co-Ru/carbon nanotube [J].
Haghtalab, Ali ;
Shariati, Jafar ;
Mosayebi, Amir .
REACTION KINETICS MECHANISMS AND CATALYSIS, 2019, 126 (02) :1003-1026
[17]   Co@Ru nanoparticle with core-shell structure supported over γ-Al2O3 for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis [J].
Haghtalab, Ali ;
Mosayebi, Amir .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (33) :18882-18893
[18]  
Hassoun M H, 1996, IEEE Trans Neural Netw, V7, P1053, DOI 10.1109/TNN.1996.508951
[19]   MULTILAYER FEEDFORWARD NETWORKS ARE UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATORS [J].
HORNIK, K ;
STINCHCOMBE, M ;
WHITE, H .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 1989, 2 (05) :359-366
[20]   Hybrid modelling and kinetic estimation for polystyrene batch reactor using Artificial Neutral Network (ANN) approach [J].
Hosen, Mohammad Anwar ;
Hussain, Mohd Azlan ;
Mjalli, Farouq S. .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 6 (02) :274-287