Device migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Experience with a talent Stent-Graft

被引:23
作者
England, A
Butterfield, JS
Jones, N
McCollum, CN
Nasim, A
Welch, M
Ashleigh, RJ
机构
[1] Univ S Manchester Hosp, Dept Radiol, Manchester M23 9LT, Lancs, England
[2] Univ S Manchester Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Manchester M23 9LT, Lancs, England
[3] St Martins Coll, Dept Radiog & Imaging Sci, Lancaster LA1 3JD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.RVI.0000142601.10673.00
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Device migration (DM) may cause late failure after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Computed tomography (CT) scans following EVAR were reviewed to establish the frequency of DM and whether it can be predicted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients underwent EVAR with a Talent stent-graft with suprarenal fixation. CT with a fixed protocol was performed at regular intervals. Patient demographics, risk factors, procedure details, and follow-up events were reviewed. Two observers, blinded to each other, reviewed axial images and mutliplanar reformats of the CT scans. DM was defined as a change of : 10 mm in the distance between a reference vessel (celiac axis/superior mesenteric artery) and the proximal device. Follow-up was performed for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 3 years; range, 2-5 years). RESULTS: DM was detected in six of 38 patients (15.8%) by 2 years. There were no new cases of migration in the 19 patients at 3 years but one new case in the six patients at 4 years (16.6%). Mean migration over 2 years was 4.8 mm +/- 4.2 mm. One patient with DM developed a type I endoleak that required reintervention. This patient developed a further endoleak and died following surgery for rupture. Top neck enlargement was the only predictive factor identified, present in 71% of patients with DM (P =.056). CONCLUSION: DM occurred in a small proportion of patients; closer follow-up intervals may be necessary in patients with short/enlarging proximal necks.
引用
收藏
页码:1399 / 1405
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Anatomical risk factors for proximal perigraft endoleak and graft migration following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Albertini, JN ;
Kalliafas, S ;
Travis, S ;
Yusuf, SW ;
Macierewicz, JA ;
Whitaker, SC ;
Elmarasy, NM ;
Hopkinson, BR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 19 (03) :308-312
[2]   Outcomes of secondary interventions after abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair [J].
Becquemin, JP ;
Kelley, L ;
Zubilewicz, T ;
Desgranges, P ;
Lapeyre, M ;
Kobeiter, H .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (02) :298-304
[3]   Device migration after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Analysis of 113 cases with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years [J].
Cao, P ;
Verzini, F ;
Zannetti, S ;
De Rango, P ;
Parlani, G ;
Lupattelli, L ;
Maselli, A .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (02) :229-235
[4]   Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Harris, PL ;
White, GH ;
Zarins, CK ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Matsumura, JS ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Rutherford, RB ;
Kent, KC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1048-1060
[5]   Endograft migration one to four years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the AneuRx device: A cautionary note [J].
Conners, MS ;
Sternbergh, WC ;
Carter, G ;
Tonnessen, BH ;
Yoselevitz, M ;
Money, SR .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 36 (03) :476-482
[6]  
Cowie AG, 2003, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V14, P1011
[7]  
Criado FJ, 2001, J VASC SURG, V33, pS146
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[9]   Efficacy of a bifurcated endograft versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A reappraisal [J].
Makaroun, MS ;
Chaikof, E ;
Naslund, T ;
Matsumura, JS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (02) :203-210
[10]  
Malina M, 1997, J ENDOVASC SURG, V4, P23, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0023:CAMAEG>2.0.CO