Long-term breast and nipple sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: Relevance to physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being

被引:16
|
作者
Hammond, Jacob B. [1 ]
Kandi, Lyndsay A. [2 ]
Armstrong, Valerie L. [1 ]
Kosiorek, Heidi E. [3 ]
Rebecca, Alanna M. [2 ]
Casey, William J., III [2 ]
Kruger, Erwin A. [2 ]
Cronin, Patricia A. [4 ]
Pockaj, Barbara A. [4 ]
Teven, Chad M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Res, Biostat Sect, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Surg Oncol & Endocrine Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[5] Northwestern Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Nipple-sparing Mastectomy; Sensation; Quality-of-life; SKIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.034
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The effect of postoperative sensation on quality-of-life (QoL) following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with implant-based reconstruction is not well described. We evaluated the impact of breast and nipple sensation on patient QoL by using BREAST-Q. Methods: Patients undergoing NSM with implant reconstruction from 2008 to 2020 were mailed a survey to characterize their postoperative breast and nipple sensation. BREAST-Q metrics were compared between totally numb patients and those with sensation. Results: A total of 349 patients were included. Overall, 131 (38%) responded; response rates regarding breast and nipple sensation were 36% (N = 124/349) and 34% (N = 117/349). Median time from surgery to survey completion was 6 years. The majority had bilateral procedures (101, 77%), including direct-to-implant (99, 76%) and tissue expander (32, 24%) reconstruction. Regarding breast sensation, the majority of patients reported their reconstructed breasts as totally numb (47, 38%) or much less sensation than before surgery (59, 48%). Regarding nipple sensation, the majority of patients reported their nipples were totally numb (67, 57%) or had much less sensation than before surgery (37, 32%). Total numbness of reconstructed breasts resulted in a significantly lower chest physical well-being (mean score: 73.5 vs. 81.2, respectively, P = 0.048). Total numbness of postoperative nipple(s) resulted in significantly lower chest physical (mean score: 74.8 vs. 85.2, respectively, P = 0.007), psychosocial (mean score 77.4 vs. 84.4, respectively, P = 0.041), and sexual well-being (mean score: 55.7 vs. 68.3, respectively, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Long-term breast and nipple sensation are significantly diminished after NSM with implant reconstruction. Patients with preserved sensation experience better physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being. (c) 2022 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2914 / 2919
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Immediate implant reconstruction using absorbable TIGR mesh after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Quinn, Edel Marie
    Barry, Mitchel
    Kell, Malcolm
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 43 (03) : 279 - 284
  • [22] Immediate implant reconstruction using absorbable TIGR mesh after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Edel Marie Quinn
    Mitchel Barry
    Malcolm Kell
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2020, 43 : 279 - 284
  • [23] Secondary Mastopexy After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Staged Subcutaneous Expander/Implant Reconstruction
    Salibian, Arthur H.
    Harness, Jay K.
    Mowlds, Donald S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 (05) : 475 - 480
  • [24] Symmetry of Nipple Position After Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction The Impact of Reconstructive Method
    Mercury, Oblaise
    Nores, Gabriella Garcia
    Carlson, Grant W.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 88 (05) : S422 - S426
  • [25] Patient Satisfaction and Nipple-Areola Sensitivity After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction in a High Breast Cancer Risk Population Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    van Verschuer, Victorien M. T.
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Gopie, Jessica P.
    Vos, Elvira L.
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 77 (02) : 145 - 152
  • [26] Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Recurrence From Previous Breast Conservation Therapy
    Lee, Che-Hsiung
    Cheng, Ming-Huei
    Wu, Chih-Wei
    Kuo, Wen-Ling
    Yu, Chi-Chang
    Huang, Jung-Ju
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 82 : S95 - S102
  • [27] Comparative Study of Nipple–Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander–Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    Hyungsuk Kim
    Sun-June Park
    Kyong-Je Woo
    Sa Ik Bang
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2019, 43 : 313 - 327
  • [28] Ischemic Complications After Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Implant-based Reconstruction A Critical Analysis
    Razavi, S. Amir
    Hart, Alexandra L.
    Carlson, Grant W.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (6S) : S526 - S531
  • [29] Nipple-Areolar Complex Ischemia After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction: Risk Factors and the Success of Conservative Treatment
    Dent, Briar L.
    Small, Kevin
    Swistel, Alexander
    Talmor, Mia
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2014, 34 (04) : 560 - 570
  • [30] Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique
    Uhi Toh
    Miki Takenaka
    Nobutaka Iwakuma
    Yoshito Akagi
    Surgery Today, 2021, 51 : 862 - 871