Long-term breast and nipple sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: Relevance to physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being

被引:16
|
作者
Hammond, Jacob B. [1 ]
Kandi, Lyndsay A. [2 ]
Armstrong, Valerie L. [1 ]
Kosiorek, Heidi E. [3 ]
Rebecca, Alanna M. [2 ]
Casey, William J., III [2 ]
Kruger, Erwin A. [2 ]
Cronin, Patricia A. [4 ]
Pockaj, Barbara A. [4 ]
Teven, Chad M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Res, Biostat Sect, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Surg Oncol & Endocrine Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[5] Northwestern Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Nipple-sparing Mastectomy; Sensation; Quality-of-life; SKIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.034
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The effect of postoperative sensation on quality-of-life (QoL) following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with implant-based reconstruction is not well described. We evaluated the impact of breast and nipple sensation on patient QoL by using BREAST-Q. Methods: Patients undergoing NSM with implant reconstruction from 2008 to 2020 were mailed a survey to characterize their postoperative breast and nipple sensation. BREAST-Q metrics were compared between totally numb patients and those with sensation. Results: A total of 349 patients were included. Overall, 131 (38%) responded; response rates regarding breast and nipple sensation were 36% (N = 124/349) and 34% (N = 117/349). Median time from surgery to survey completion was 6 years. The majority had bilateral procedures (101, 77%), including direct-to-implant (99, 76%) and tissue expander (32, 24%) reconstruction. Regarding breast sensation, the majority of patients reported their reconstructed breasts as totally numb (47, 38%) or much less sensation than before surgery (59, 48%). Regarding nipple sensation, the majority of patients reported their nipples were totally numb (67, 57%) or had much less sensation than before surgery (37, 32%). Total numbness of reconstructed breasts resulted in a significantly lower chest physical well-being (mean score: 73.5 vs. 81.2, respectively, P = 0.048). Total numbness of postoperative nipple(s) resulted in significantly lower chest physical (mean score: 74.8 vs. 85.2, respectively, P = 0.007), psychosocial (mean score 77.4 vs. 84.4, respectively, P = 0.041), and sexual well-being (mean score: 55.7 vs. 68.3, respectively, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Long-term breast and nipple sensation are significantly diminished after NSM with implant reconstruction. Patients with preserved sensation experience better physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being. (c) 2022 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2914 / 2919
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction
    Wei, Cindy H.
    Scott, Amie M.
    Price, Alison N.
    Miller, Helen Catherine
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Jhanwar, Sabrina M.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Disa, Joseph J.
    McCarthy, Colleen
    Matros, Evan
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [2] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Improves Long-Term Nipple But Not Skin Sensation After Breast Reconstruction Quantification of Long-Term Sensation in Nipple Sparing Versus Non-nipple Sparing Mastectomy
    Rodriguez-Unda, Nelson A.
    Bello, Ricardo J.
    Clarke-Pearson, Emily M.
    Sanyal, Abanti
    Cooney, Carisa M.
    Manahan, Michele A.
    Rosson, Gedge D.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 78 (06) : 697 - 703
  • [3] Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander–implant reconstruction
    Hiroki Mori
    Noriko Uemura
    Mutsumi Okazaki
    Tsuyoshi Nakagawa
    Takanobu Sato
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 740 - 744
  • [4] Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander-implant reconstruction
    Mori, Hiroki
    Uemura, Noriko
    Okazaki, Mutsumi
    Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi
    Sato, Takanobu
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (05) : 740 - 744
  • [5] Evaluation of Breast Skin/Nipple-Areolar Complex Sensation and Quality of Life after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Followed by Reconstruction
    Polita, Beatriz Soares Domingues
    Lapins, Janis
    Gilis, Ansis
    Grucki, Michal
    Irmejs, Arvids
    Gardovskis, Janis
    Maksimenko, Jelena
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (10):
  • [6] Long-Term Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction
    Yamashita, Yuji
    Tsunoda, Hiroko
    Nagura, Naomi
    Kajiura, Yuka
    Yoshida, Atsushi
    Takei, Junko
    Suzuki, Koyu
    Watanabe, Tadashi
    Iwahira, Yoshiko
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    Hayashi, Naoki
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2021, 21 (04) : 352 - 359
  • [7] Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Shia, Wei-Chung
    Yang, Hui-Ju
    Wu, Hwa-Koon
    Lin, Shih-Lung
    Lai, Hung-Wen
    Huang, Yu-Len
    Chen, Dar-Ren
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 231 : 290 - 296
  • [8] A descriptive comparison of satisfaction and well-being between expander-based and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Riggio, Egidio
    Alfieri, Sara
    Toffoli, Elisa
    Borreani, Claudia
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [9] A descriptive comparison of satisfaction and well-being between expander-based and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Egidio Riggio
    Sara Alfieri
    Elisa Toffoli
    Claudia Borreani
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 30 - 39
  • [10] Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant
    Hung-Wen Lai
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 53 - 54