Solid oxide fuel cell operation with biomass gasification product gases: Performance- and carbon deposition risk evaluation via a CFD modelling approach

被引:24
作者
Pongratz, Gernot [1 ]
Subotic, Vanja [1 ]
Hochenauer, Christoph [1 ,2 ]
Scharler, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Anca-Couce, Andres [1 ]
机构
[1] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Thermal Engn, Inffeldgasse 25b, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[2] BEST Bioenergy & Sustainable Technol GmbH, Inffeldgasse 21b, A-8010 Graz, Austria
关键词
Solid oxide fuel cell; Biomass gasification; Combined heat and power; Carbon deposition; CFD Modelling; SOFC OPERATION; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; DIESEL REFORMAT; GASIFIER; TARS; OPTIMIZATION; DEGRADATION; ELECTROLYTE; SIMULATION; CHEMISTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2021.123085
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) models used in the past for biomass-to-power plant simulations are limited in their predictability of the carbon deposition risk. In this work, industrial-relevant cell designs were modeled in 2D-CFD considering detailed reaction kinetics which allowed more accurate performance simulations and carbon deposition risk assessments. Via a parametric study, the influence of varying cell operating conditions on the cell performance and carbon deposition risk was quantified when utilizing product gases from steam- and air gasification with varying steam addition. Considering the results from this parameter study and carbon deposition risk assessment, recommendations for promising gasifier-SOFC configurations and cell operating points for stable long-term operation are presented. For smaller-scale biomass-to-power systems, the utilization of product gas from air gasification in anode supported cells with Ni/zirconia-based anode can be recommended, with only moderate steam dilution of the product gas at 750 degrees C cell operating temperature. For larger scales, steam gasification might be meaningful, offering a generally higher electrical efficiency and power output in fuel cells than air gasification. However, a higher risk for carbon deposition could be determined in comparison to air gasification. Hence, a cell temperature of 850 degrees C besides the use of cells with Ni/ceria-based anodes is recommended. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Bioenergy technologies, uses, market and future trends with Austria as a case study [J].
Anca-Couce, A. ;
Hochenauer, C. ;
Scharler, R. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 135
[2]   Review on modeling development for multiscale chemical reactions coupled transport phenomena in solid oxide fuel cells [J].
Andersson, Martin ;
Yuan, Jinliang ;
Sunden, Bengt .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (05) :1461-1476
[3]  
ANSYS Inc, 2020, FLUENT THEOR GUID
[4]   Evaluation of high temperature gas cleaning options for biomass gasification product gas for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells [J].
Aravind, P. V. ;
de Jong, Wiebren .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2012, 38 (06) :737-764
[5]   Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: A Review [J].
Argyle, Morris D. ;
Bartholomew, Calvin H. .
CATALYSTS, 2015, 5 (01) :145-269
[6]   Performance characterization and modelling of syngas-fed SOFCs (solid oxide fuel cells) varying fuel composition [J].
Baldinelli, Arianna ;
Barelli, Linda ;
Bidini, Gianni .
ENERGY, 2015, 90 :2070-2084
[7]   Exergy analysis and optimization of a biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid system [J].
Bang-Moller, C. ;
Rokni, M. ;
Elmegaard, B. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (08) :4740-4752
[8]   THE TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC-FEASIBILITY OF BIOMASS GASIFICATION FOR POWER-GENERATION [J].
BRIDGWATER, AV .
FUEL, 1995, 74 (05) :631-653
[9]  
Bridgwater AV, 2009, THERMAL BIOMASS CONV
[10]   Thermodynamic model and parametric analysis of a tubular SOFC module [J].
Campanari, S .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2001, 92 (1-2) :26-34