Community Participation for People with Trauma Injuries: A Study Protocol of a Crossover Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of a Community Mobility Group Intervention (CarFreeMe TI)

被引:3
作者
George, Stacey [1 ]
Barr, Christopher [2 ]
Berndt, Angela [3 ]
Crotty, Maria [4 ]
Milte, Rachel [5 ]
Nussio, Amy [1 ]
Liddle, Jacki [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Occupat Therapy Clin Rehabil, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Clin Rehabil, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Occupat Therapy, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Rehabil Aged & Extended Care, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ South Australia, Inst Choice, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Sch Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Trauma injuries; traumatic brain injury; spinal cord injuries; group-based intervention; community mobility; participation; community participation; ACQUIRED BRAIN-INJURY; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; LIFE SATISFACTION; DRIVING CESSATION; COST-BENEFITS; INTEGRATION; REHABILITATION; ADJUSTMENT; PREDICTORS; RETURN;
D O I
10.1017/BrImp.2019.1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Following traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries, maximising community participation leads to better physical and mental health outcomes. Objectives: To determine the effectiveness and health system resource use of a group intervention (CarFreeMe TI) on community participation in people with complex trauma injuries. Method: Randomised crossover trial of 54 participants, recruited from rehabilitation services in Adelaide, Australia. Inclusion criteria is a trauma injury, unable to return to full driving, aged over 18 years of age, adequate cognition/behavioural/communication abilities to participate in sessions and mobile. Exclusion criterion is living in setting where alternative transport is provided. Participants will be randomly assigned on a 1:1 allocation basis, to receiving Phase 1 CarFreeMe TI-group-based intervention or Phase 2 information related to transport options. Then, crossover to Phase 1 or 2 will occur. Primary outcome measure is community participation using a Global Positioning System. Secondary outcome measures include Community Mobility Self-efficacy Scale; CarFreeMe TI Transport Questionnaire, AQOL, EQ-5D-5L; Carer's Community Mobility Self-efficacy Scale and Modified Carer Strain Index for carers of participants. Outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation. All analyses will be on an intention to treat basis with difference in community participation between the groups determined via a GLM ANOVA and the significance between groups on other measures using independent sample t-tests. It is hypothesised that the community mobility intervention (CarFreeMeTI) will result in increased community participation. Discussion: The results will provide proof of concept information on the feasibility and inform allocation of resources for people with complex trauma injuries.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 103
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Access Economics, 2009, EC COST SPIN CORD IN, V31
[2]   Economic Evaluations in the Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Quality [J].
Alali, Aziz S. ;
Burton, Kirsteen ;
Fowler, Robert A. ;
Naimark, David M. J. ;
Scales, Damon C. ;
Mainprize, Todd G. ;
Nathens, Avery B. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (05) :721-734
[3]   Social and community participation following spinal cord injury: a critical review [J].
Barclay, Linda ;
McDonald, Rachael ;
Lentin, Primrose .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2015, 38 (01) :1-19
[4]   Sociological perspectives on travel and mobilities: A review [J].
Cairns, Sally ;
Harmer, Clare ;
Hopkin, Jean ;
Skippon, Stephen .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2014, 63 :107-117
[5]   Traumatic Brain Injury and Driving Assessment: An Evidence-Based Literature Review [J].
Classen, Sherrilene ;
Levy, Charles ;
McCarthy, Dennis ;
Mann, William C. ;
Lanford, Desiree ;
Waid-Ebbs, J. Kay .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2009, 63 (05) :580-591
[6]  
Grimby G, 2010, J REHABIL MED, V42, P284
[7]   Return to driving after head injury [J].
Hawley, CA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 70 (06) :761-766
[8]   The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument:: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life [J].
Hawthorne, G ;
Richardson, J ;
Osborne, R .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (03) :209-224
[9]   Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) [J].
Herdman, M. ;
Gudex, C. ;
Lloyd, A. ;
Janssen, M. F. ;
Kind, P. ;
Parkin, D. ;
Bonsel, G. ;
Badia, X. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (10) :1727-1736
[10]   Use of an Activity Monitor and GPS Device to Assess Community Activity and Participation in Transtibial Amputees [J].
Hordacre, Brenton ;
Barr, Christopher ;
Crotty, Maria .
SENSORS, 2014, 14 (04) :5845-5859