Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice?

被引:73
作者
Tomlinson, CA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15430421tip4403_11
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teachers often perceive an inherent conflict between "differentiated instruction," which emphasizes attention to variance in students' readiness levels, interests, and learning profiles, and "the grading system," which seems to indicate a sort of rigidity and standardization. This article examines keyprinciples of quality differentiation and of quality grading to determine whether the two facets of educational practice are compatible. It concludes that the perceived incompatibility stems from misunderstanding the essential principles of differentiation and grading, and from entrenched classroom habits that often run counter to guidance from experts in grading and in differentiation.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Airasian P.W., 1997, Classroom assessment, V3rd
[2]  
AZWELL T, 1995, REPORT REPORT CARDS
[3]  
Earl L., 2003, Assessment as learning
[4]  
GUSKEY T, 2001, DEV GRADING REPORT S
[5]  
Marzano R., 2000, Transforming classroom grading
[6]  
O'Connor K., 2002, How to grade for learning: Linking grades to standards, V2nd
[7]  
*OFF ED RES IMPR, 1992, HARD WORK HIGH EXP M
[8]  
TOMLINSON C, IN PRESS UNDERSTANDI
[9]  
Tomlinson C., 1999, The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners
[10]  
Tomlinson C. A., 2002, PARALLEL CURRICULUM