Comparing the efficacy of prophylactic metoclopramide, ondansetron, and placebo in cesarean section patients given epidural anesthesia

被引:39
作者
Pan, PH [1 ]
Moore, CH [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Obstet Anesthesiol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
关键词
anesthesia; regional; antiemetics; cesarean section; obstetrics; 5-HT3; receptor;
D O I
10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00294-X
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare the relative efficacy of prophylactic metoclopramide, ondansetron, and Placebo in nonemergent cesarean section patients given epidural anesthesia intraoperatively and for the first 24-hour period after delivery. Design: Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Setting: Inpatient obstetric unit at a university hospital center. Patients: 164 nonemergent cesarean section patients given epidural anesthesia. Intervention: At time of umbilical cord clamp, patients received intravenously (IV) either 4 mg ondansetron (Group O) or 10 mg metoclopramide (Group M) or 10 mL normal saline (Group P). Measurements and Main Results: Episodes and severity of nausea and vomiting, rescue antiemetic requirement, Patient satisfaction, and side effects were recorded. The frequency of intraoperative nausea were 24%, 43%, and 57% for Group O, Group M, and Group P, respectively (p < 0.03). The frequency of nausea for the 24-hour study period were 26%, 51% and 71% for Groups O, M, and P respectively (p < 0.03). The frequency of intraoperative and postoperative vomiting were similar between Group 0 and Group M, but significantly higher in Group P (p < 0.05). Overall patient satisfaction was highest in Group O compared with Groups P and M (p < 0.05). Maximum analog sedation score was higher in Group M compared to Groups O and P (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In cesarean section Patients given epidural anesthesia, prophylactic ondansetron, 4 mg TV, is more efficacious and has a higher patient satisfaction than that with metoclopramide, 10 mg IV, or placebo in preventing nausea and achieving complete responses during intraoperative period and the first 24-hour postdelivery period. However, there is no difference between ondansetron and metoclopramide in reducing-frequency of vomiting. Prophylactic ondansetron 4 mg TV is more effective in preventing nausea than vomiting. (C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 435
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   ADMINISTRATION OF METOCLOPRAMIDE FOR PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING DURING EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
CHESTNUT, DH ;
VANDEWALKER, GE ;
OWEN, CL ;
BATES, JN ;
CHOI, WW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 66 (04) :563-566
[2]   ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF DROPERIDOL AND METOCLOPRAMIDE [J].
COHEN, SE ;
WOODS, WA ;
WYNER, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1984, 60 (01) :67-69
[3]   Comparative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: A meta-analysis [J].
Domino, KB ;
Anderson, EA ;
Polissar, NL ;
Posner, KL .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (06) :1370-1379
[4]   Metoclopramide exaggerates stress-induced tachycardia in pregnant sheep [J].
Eisenach, JC ;
Dewan, DM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (03) :607-611
[5]  
FISCHLER M, 1986, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V64, P486
[6]  
Gan T. J., 1998, Anesthesiology (Hagerstown), V89, pA7, DOI 10.1097/00000542-199809010-00007
[7]  
GAN TJ, 1998, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V89, pA3
[8]   METOCLOPRAMIDE - AN UPDATED REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES AND CLINICAL USE [J].
HARRINGTON, RA ;
HAMILTON, CW ;
BROGDEN, RN ;
LINKEWICH, JA ;
ROMANKIEWICZ, JA ;
HEEL, RC .
DRUGS, 1983, 25 (05) :451-494
[9]  
LUSSOS SA, 1992, REGION ANESTH, V17, P126
[10]   Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid? The perspective of a panel of expert anesthesiologists [J].
Macario, A ;
Weinger, M ;
Truong, P ;
Lee, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (05) :1085-1091