Bayesian optimal interval design for phase I oncology clinical trials

被引:3
|
作者
Fellman, Bryan M. [1 ]
Yuan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
st0372; optinterval; Bayesian optimal interval; phase I clinical trial design; maximum tolerated dose; operating characteristic;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X1501500107
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design is a novel phase I trial design for finding the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). With the BOIN design, phase I trials are conducted as a sequence of decision-making steps for assigning an appropriate dose for each enrolled patient. The design optimizes the assignment of doses to patients by minimizing incorrect decisions of dose escalation or deescalation; that is, it decreases the chance of erroneously escalating or de-escalating the dose when the current dose is higher or lower than the MTD. This feature of the BOIN design strongly ensures adherence to ethical standards. The most prominent advantage of the BOIN design is that it simultaneously achieves design simplicity and superior performance in comparison with similar methods. The BOIN design can be implemented in a simple way that is similar to the 3 3 design, but it yields substantially better operating characteristics. Compared with the well-known continual reassessment method, the BOIN design yields average performance when selecting the MTD, but it has a substantially lower risk of assigning patients to subtherapeutic or overly toxic doses. In this article, we present a command (optinterval) for implementing the BOIN design in a phase I clinical trial setting.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 120
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-specific dose finding in phase I clinical trials
    Moni, Md. Moniruzzaman
    Alam, M. Iftakhar
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 45 (14) : 2607 - 2618
  • [42] Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology-A simulation study
    Gerke, Oke
    Siedentop, Harald
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (26) : 5329 - 5344
  • [43] Approximate Dynamic Programming and Its Applications to the Design of Phase I Cancer Trials
    Bartroff, Jay
    Lai, Tze Leung
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (02) : 245 - 257
  • [44] Specifications of a continual reassessment method design for phase I trials of combined drugs
    Wages, Nolan A.
    Conaway, Mark R.
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2013, 12 (04) : 217 - 224
  • [45] Revisiting the definition of dose-limiting toxicities in paediatric oncology phase I clinical trials: An analysis from the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium
    Bautista, Francisco
    Moreno, Lucas
    Marshall, Lynley
    Pearson, Andrew D. J.
    Geoerger, Birgit
    Paoletti, Xavier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 86 : 275 - 284
  • [46] A Bayesian Case Study in Oncology Phase I Combination Dose-Finding Using Logistic Regression with Covariates
    Bailey, Stuart
    Neuenschwander, Beat
    Laird, Glen
    Branson, Michael
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2009, 19 (03) : 469 - 484
  • [47] Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent
    Muenz, Daniel G.
    Braun, Thomas M.
    Taylor, Jeremy M. G.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 15 (04) : 386 - 397
  • [48] Isotonic designs for phase I trials
    Leung, DHY
    Wang, YG
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2001, 22 (02): : 126 - 138
  • [49] HEMATOPOIETIC GROWTH-FACTORS AND CHEMOPROTECTANTS - SHOULD WE MOVE TOWARD A 2-STEP PROCESS FOR PHASE-I CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    MERROUCHE, Y
    CATIMEL, G
    CLAVEL, M
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1993, 4 (06) : 471 - 474
  • [50] An adaptive gBOIN design with shrinkage boundaries for phase I dose-finding trials
    Mu, Rongji
    Hu, Zongliang
    Xu, Guoying
    Pan, Haitao
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)