Bayesian optimal interval design for phase I oncology clinical trials

被引:3
|
作者
Fellman, Bryan M. [1 ]
Yuan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
st0372; optinterval; Bayesian optimal interval; phase I clinical trial design; maximum tolerated dose; operating characteristic;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X1501500107
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design is a novel phase I trial design for finding the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). With the BOIN design, phase I trials are conducted as a sequence of decision-making steps for assigning an appropriate dose for each enrolled patient. The design optimizes the assignment of doses to patients by minimizing incorrect decisions of dose escalation or deescalation; that is, it decreases the chance of erroneously escalating or de-escalating the dose when the current dose is higher or lower than the MTD. This feature of the BOIN design strongly ensures adherence to ethical standards. The most prominent advantage of the BOIN design is that it simultaneously achieves design simplicity and superior performance in comparison with similar methods. The BOIN design can be implemented in a simple way that is similar to the 3 3 design, but it yields substantially better operating characteristics. Compared with the well-known continual reassessment method, the BOIN design yields average performance when selecting the MTD, but it has a substantially lower risk of assigning patients to subtherapeutic or overly toxic doses. In this article, we present a command (optinterval) for implementing the BOIN design in a phase I clinical trial setting.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 120
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Up-and-down designs for phase I clinical trials
    Liu, Suyu
    Cai, Chunyan
    Ning, Jing
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2013, 36 (01) : 218 - 227
  • [32] dfpk: An R-package for Bayesian dose-finding designs using pharmacokinetics (PK) for phase I clinical trials
    Toumazi, A.
    Comets, E.
    Alberti, C.
    Friede, T.
    Lentz, F.
    Stallard, N.
    Zohar, S.
    Ursino, M.
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 157 : 163 - 177
  • [33] Accuracy and Safety of Novel Designs for Phase I Drug-Combination Oncology Trials
    Liu, Rong
    Yuan, Ying
    Sen, Suman
    Yang, Xin
    Jiang, Qi
    Li, Xiaoyun
    Lu, Chengxing
    Gonen, Mithat
    Tian, Hong
    Zhou, Heng
    Lin, Ruitao
    Marchenko, Olga
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 14 (03): : 270 - 282
  • [34] A curve-free method for Phase I clinical trials
    Gasparini, M
    Eisele, J
    BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) : 609 - 615
  • [35] Incorporating historical information to improve phase I clinical trials
    Zhou, Yanhong
    Lee, J. Jack
    Wang, Shunguang
    Bailey, Stuart
    Yuan, Ying
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2021, 20 (06) : 1017 - 1034
  • [36] Phase I trial design for drug combinations with Bayesian model averaging
    Jin, Ick Hoon
    Huo, Lin
    Yin, Guosheng
    Yuan, Ying
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2015, 14 (02) : 108 - 119
  • [37] Exploring Ethnic Differences in Toxicity in Early-Phase Clinical Trials for Oncology Drugs
    Takashi Ogura
    Satoshi Morita
    Kan Yonemori
    Takahiro Nonaka
    Tsutomu Urano
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2014, 48 : 644 - 650
  • [38] Exploring Ethnic Differences in Toxicity in Early-Phase Clinical Trials for Oncology Drugs
    Ogura, Takashi
    Morita, Satoshi
    Yonemori, Kan
    Nonaka, Takahiro
    Urano, Tsutomu
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2014, 48 (05) : 644 - 650
  • [39] Designs for phase I cancer clinical trials with differentiation of graded toxicity
    Wang, CY
    Chen, TT
    Tyan, I
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2000, 29 (5-6) : 975 - 987
  • [40] Motivating sample sizes in adaptive Phase I trials via Bayesian posterior credible intervals
    Braun, Thomas M.
    BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (03) : 1065 - 1071