Bayesian optimal interval design for phase I oncology clinical trials

被引:3
|
作者
Fellman, Bryan M. [1 ]
Yuan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
st0372; optinterval; Bayesian optimal interval; phase I clinical trial design; maximum tolerated dose; operating characteristic;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X1501500107
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design is a novel phase I trial design for finding the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). With the BOIN design, phase I trials are conducted as a sequence of decision-making steps for assigning an appropriate dose for each enrolled patient. The design optimizes the assignment of doses to patients by minimizing incorrect decisions of dose escalation or deescalation; that is, it decreases the chance of erroneously escalating or de-escalating the dose when the current dose is higher or lower than the MTD. This feature of the BOIN design strongly ensures adherence to ethical standards. The most prominent advantage of the BOIN design is that it simultaneously achieves design simplicity and superior performance in comparison with similar methods. The BOIN design can be implemented in a simple way that is similar to the 3 3 design, but it yields substantially better operating characteristics. Compared with the well-known continual reassessment method, the BOIN design yields average performance when selecting the MTD, but it has a substantially lower risk of assigning patients to subtherapeutic or overly toxic doses. In this article, we present a command (optinterval) for implementing the BOIN design in a phase I clinical trial setting.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 120
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Bayesian optimal interval design with multiple toxicity constraints
    Lin, Ruitao
    BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (04) : 1320 - 1330
  • [12] An extended Bayesian semi-mechanistic dose-finding design for phase I oncology trials using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information
    Yang, Chao
    Li, Yisheng
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (04) : 689 - 705
  • [13] Optimal dose escalation methods using deep reinforcement learning in phase I oncology trials
    Matsuura, Kentaro
    Sakamaki, Kentaro
    Honda, Junya
    Sozu, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2023, 33 (05) : 639 - 652
  • [14] A Bayesian adaptive design for cancer phase I trials using a flexible range of doses
    Tighiouart, Mourad
    Cook-Wiens, Galen
    Rogatko, Andre
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2018, 28 (03) : 562 - 574
  • [15] Development of interactive software for Bayesian optimal phase 1 clinical trial design
    Rosenberger, WF
    Canfield, GC
    Perevozskaya, I
    Haines, LM
    Hausner, P
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2005, 39 (01): : 89 - 98
  • [16] Development of Interactive Software for Bayesian Optimal Phase 1 Clinical Trial Design
    William F. Rosenberger
    Gerald C. Canfield
    Inna Perevozskaya
    Linda M. Haines
    Petr Hausner
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2005, 39 (1): : 89 - 98
  • [17] BOIN: a novel Bayesian design platform to accelerate early phase brain tumor clinical trials
    Yuan, Ying
    Wu, Jing
    Gilbert, Mark R.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (06) : 627 - 638
  • [18] Longitudinal design for phase I clinical trials using the continual reassessment method
    Legedza, ATR
    Ibrahim, JG
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2000, 21 (06): : 574 - 588
  • [19] Isotonic Design for Phase I Clinical Trials: Can We Improve Further?
    Alam, M. Iftakhar
    Sultana, Jafrin
    AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2019, 48 (05) : 34 - 44
  • [20] Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials
    Neuenschwander, Beat
    Branson, Michael
    Gsponer, Thomas
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (13) : 2420 - 2439