OnQol: Electronic device to capture QoL data in oncology: Difference between patients 65 years or older and patients younger than 65 years of age

被引:2
作者
Oliveira, Alexandra [1 ]
Ferreira, Pedro L. [1 ,2 ]
Antunes, Barbara [1 ,3 ]
Pimentel, Francisco L. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, CEISUC, Ctr Hlth Studies & Res, P-3000 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, P-3000 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Kings Coll London, London, England
[4] Univ Aveiro, Hlth Sci Dept, Aveiro, Portugal
[5] Lenitudes, Santa Maria Feira, Portugal
关键词
QoL; Oncology; Data capture; QLQ-C30; Older patients; Geriatrics; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER-PATIENTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; INFORMATION; OUTCOMES; QLQ-C30; SCORES; PAPER; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2011.08.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the feasibility of electronic data capture for older patients, as well as to compare preferences between answering a paper version versus an electronic version in patients with cancer who are older and younger than 65 years of age. Materials and methods: The computer and the paper versions of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire were administered to a sample of 200 cancer patients. Results: 38.7% of older patients preferred the electronic version, 8.1% preferred the paper questionnaire and 53.2% had no preference between these two methods. No statistically significant differences between the answers on the paper and computer versions were found. The best correlation in responses was seen in the "diarrhea" and "physical functioning" subscales. Patients preferred to use the computer version in comparison to the paper version. Conclusions: The computer version of the QLQ-C30 demonstrated similar results to the paper version and proved to be preferred by the cancer patients included in the study. This method is useful for monitoring patients' QoL in daily oncology practice and in real time, being a potential useful method to support clinical decision making. It is feasible and useful to use these tools with an older population of patients. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 258
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]  
Baum A., 2001, Psychosocial interventions for cancer
[3]   Oncologists' use of quality of life information: Results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians [J].
Bezjak, A ;
Ng, P ;
Skeel, R ;
DePetrillo, AD ;
Comis, R ;
Taylor, KM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (01) :1-13
[4]  
BLIVEN B, 2004, QUAL LIFE RES, V10, P15
[5]   A year in the life of oncology health services research. [J].
Brundage, M. ;
Snyder, C. F. ;
Bass, B. H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
[6]   Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. [J].
Buxton, J ;
White, M ;
Osoba, D .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (06) :513-519
[7]   Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic [J].
Carlson, LE ;
Speca, M ;
Hagen, N ;
Taenzer, P .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2001, 17 (01) :46-52
[8]   METHODS AND PROBLEMS IN MEASURING QUALITY-OF-LIFE [J].
CELLA, DF .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1995, 3 (01) :11-22
[9]   Quality of life in oncology practice: Prognostic value of EORTC QLQ-C30 scores in patients with advanced malignancy [J].
Coates, A ;
Porzsolt, F ;
Osoba, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (07) :1025-1030
[10]   User preferences for computer administration of quality of life instruments [J].
Crawley, JA ;
Kleinman, L ;
Dominitz, J .
DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2000, 34 (01) :137-144