Household cost-benefit equations and sustainable universal childhood immunisation: a randomised cluster controlled trial in south Pakistan [ISRCTN12421731]

被引:17
作者
Andersson, N [1 ]
Cockcroft, A
Ansari, N
Omer, K
Losos, J
Ledogar, RJ
Tugwell, P
Shea, B
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Guerrero, Ctr Invest Enfermedades Trop, Acapulco, Mexico
[2] Inst Populat Hlth, Community Informat & Epidemiol Technol CIETcanada, Ottawa, ON K1N GN5, Canada
[3] CIET Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan
[4] Inst Populat Hlth, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] CIET Int, New York, NY USA
关键词
Knowledge Transfer; Knowledge Translation; Immunisation Coverage; Immunisation Uptake; Symbolic Coverage;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-5-72
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Household decision-makers decide about service use based largely on the costs and perceived benefits of health interventions. Very often this leads to different decisions than those imagined by health planners, resulting in under-utilisation of public services like immunisation. In the case of Lasbela district in the south of Pakistan, only one in every ten children is immunised despite free immunisation offers by government health services. Methods/design: In 32 communities representative of Lasbela district, 3344 households participated in a baseline survey on early child health. In the 18 randomly selected intervention communities, we will stimulate discussions on the household cost-benefit equation, as measured in the baseline. The reference (control) communities will also participate in the three annual follow-up surveys, feedback of the general survey results and the usual health promotion activities relating to immunisation, but without focussed discussion on the household cost-benefit equations. Discussion: This project proposes knowledge translation as a two-way communication that can be augmented by local and international evidence. We will document cultural and contextual barriers to immunisation in the context of household cost-benefit equations. The project makes this information accessible to health managers, and reciprocally, makes information on immunisation effects and side effects available to communities. We will measure the impact of this two-way knowledge translation on immunisation uptake.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] WHO PAYS FOR MEASLES - THE ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS FOR SUSTAINED IMMUNIZATION
    ANDERSSON, N
    PAREDES, S
    LEGORRETA, J
    LEDOGAR, RJ
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 1992, 7 (04) : 352 - 363
  • [2] ANDERSSON N, 1996, EVIDENCE BASED PLANN, P51
  • [3] [Anonymous], OV BARR IMM WORKSH S
  • [4] BENNETT P, 2001, RISK COMMUNICATION P
  • [5] Separate spheres and indirect benefits
    Dan W Brock
    [J]. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 1 (1)
  • [6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2002, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V51, P1
  • [7] *COMM RISK PERC CO, 1989, IMPR RISK COMM
  • [8] CONNER M, 2001, PREDICTING HLTH BEHA, P1
  • [9] *FED BUR STAT, 2002, PAK INT HOUS SURV PI
  • [10] Communicating the threat of emerging infections to the public
    Freimuth, V
    Linnan, HW
    Potter, P
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 6 (04) : 337 - 347