Life-cycle assessment framework for indoor emissions of synthetic nanoparticles

被引:17
作者
Walser, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Meyer, David [3 ]
Fransman, Wouter [4 ]
Buist, Harrie [4 ]
Kuijpers, Eelco [4 ]
Brouwer, Derk [4 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Fed Off Publ Hlth, CH-3003 Bern, Switzerland
[3] US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[4] TNO, NL-3700 AJ Zeist, Netherlands
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Indoor exposure; Synthetic nanoparticle; Nanoparticle toxicity; Occupational exposure; Engineered nanoparticle; Environmental and health effects; INHALATION EXPOSURE; PARTICLE DEPOSITION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CARBON NANOTUBES; INTAKE FRACTION; MODEL; NANOMATERIALS; SIZE; VENTILATION; TOXICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11051-015-3053-y
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a well-established method to evaluate impacts of chemicals on the environment and human health along the lifespan of products. However, the increasingly produced and applied nanomaterials (defined as one dimension <100 nm) show particular characteristics which are different from conventional chemicals or larger particles. As a consequence, LCA does not provide sufficient guidance on how to deal with synthetic nanomaterials, neither in the exposure, nor in the effect assessment. This is particularly true for the workplace, where significant exposure can be expected via the lung, the route of major concern. Therefore, we developed a concise method which allows the inclusion of indoor nanoparticle exposure into LCA. New nanospecific properties are included along the LCA stages with a particular focus on the workplace environment. We built upon existing LCA methods and nanoparticle fate and exposure studies. The impact assessment requires new approaches for nanoparticles, such as guidance on relevant endpoints, nanospecific properties that are relevant for the toxicity, and guidance on the chemical identity of nanomaterials, i.e., categorization and distinction of different forms of nanomaterials. We present a framework which goes beyond traditional approaches of LCA and includes nanospecific fate parameters in the indoor exposure assessment as well as guidance on the development of effect and characterization factors for inhaled nanoparticles. Specifically, the indoor one-box model is amended with new particle-specific parameters developed in the exposure literature. A concentration conversion and parameter estimation tool are presented. Finally, the modification of the traditional intake fraction to capture size-specific deposition and retention rate are discussed along with a strategy for a more robust effect assessment. The paper is a further step toward a fair comparison between conventional and nano-enabled products by integrating occupational exposure to synthetic nanomaterials into LCA.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]  
Honnert B, 2013, ANN OCCUP HYG
[32]   Human population intake fractions and environmental fate factors of toxic pollutants in life cycle impact assessment [J].
Huijbregts, MAJ ;
Struijs, J ;
Goedkoop, M ;
Heijungs, R ;
Hendriks, AJ ;
van de Meent, D .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2005, 61 (10) :1495-1504
[33]   Intake Fraction for Particulate Matter: Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment [J].
Humbert, Sebastien ;
Marshall, Julian D. ;
Shaked, Shanna ;
Spadaro, Joseph V. ;
Nishioka, Yurika ;
Preiss, Philipp ;
McKone, Thomas E. ;
Horvath, Arpad ;
Jolliet, Olivier .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (11) :4808-4816
[34]   Engineered nanomaterial risk. Lessons learnt from completed nanotoxicology studies: potential solutions to current and future challenges [J].
Johnston, Helinor ;
Pojana, Giulio ;
Zuin, Stefano ;
Jacobsen, Nicklas Raun ;
Moller, Peter ;
Loft, Steffen ;
Semmler-Behnke, Manuela ;
McGuiness, Catherine ;
Balharry, Dominique ;
Marcomini, Antonio ;
Wallin, Hakan ;
Kreyling, Wolfgang ;
Donaldson, Ken ;
Tran, Lang ;
Stone, Vicki .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 43 (01) :1-20
[35]   IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology [J].
Jolliet, O ;
Margni, M ;
Charles, R ;
Humbert, S ;
Payet, J ;
Rebitzer, G ;
Rosenbaum, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (06) :324-330
[36]   Differences in in the Biokinetics of Inhaled Nano- versus Micrometer-Sized Particles [J].
Kreyling, Wolfgang G. ;
Semmler-Behnke, Manuela ;
Takenaka, Shinji ;
Moeller, Winfried .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 46 (03) :714-722
[37]  
Lai DY, 2012, WIRES NANOMED NANOBI, V4, P1, DOI 10.1002/wnan.162
[38]   Six-month follow-up study of health markers of nanomaterials among workers handling engineered nanomaterials [J].
Liao, Hui-Yi ;
Chung, Yu-Teh ;
Lai, Ching-Huang ;
Wang, Shu-Li ;
Chiang, Hung-Che ;
Li, Lih-Ann ;
Tsou, Tsui-Chun ;
Li, Wan-Fen ;
Lee, Hui-Ling ;
Wu, Wei-Te ;
Lin, Ming-Hsiu ;
Hsu, Jin-Huei ;
Ho, Jiune-Jye ;
Chen, Chiou-Jong ;
Shih, Tung-Sheng ;
Lin, Chin-Chi ;
Liou, Saou-Hsing .
NANOTOXICOLOGY, 2014, 8 :100-110
[39]   Exploring the development of a decision support system (DSS) to prioritize engineered nanoparticles for risk assessment [J].
Marvin, Hans J. P. ;
Bouwmeester, Hans ;
Bakker, Martine ;
Kroese, E. Dinant ;
van de Meent, Dik ;
Bourgeois, Francois ;
Lokers, Rob ;
van der Ham, Henk ;
Verhelst, Lieke .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (08)
[40]   Estimating aerosol surface area from number and mass concentration measurements [J].
Maynard, AD .
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2003, 47 (02) :123-144