Surface dose measurement for helical tomotherapy

被引:8
|
作者
Snir, Jonatan A. [1 ]
Mosalaei, Homeira [1 ]
Jordan, Kevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yartsev, Slav [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] London Hlth Sci Ctr, London Reg Canc Program, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Oncol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
关键词
helical tomotherapy; OSL dosimeter; MOSFET dosimeter; skin dose; MOSFET; HEAD;
D O I
10.1118/1.3592021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the surface dose measurements made by different dosimeters for the helical tomotherapy (HT) plan in the case of the target close to the surface. Methods: Surface dose measurements in different points for the HT plan to deliver 2 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) at 5 mm below the surface of the cylindrical phantom were performed by radiochromic films, single use metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters, silicon IVD QED diode, and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters. Results: The measured doses by all dosimeters were within 12 +/- 8% difference of each other. Conclusions: Radiochromic films, EBT, and EBT(2), provide high spatial resolution, although it is difficult to get accurate measurements of dose. Both the OSL and QED measured similar dose to that of the MOSFET detectors. The QED dosimeter is promising as a reusable on-line wireless dosimeter, while the OSL dosimeters are easier to use, require minimum setup time and are very precise. (C) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3592021]
引用
收藏
页码:3104 / 3107
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dose to the skin in helical tomotherapy: Results of in vivo measurements with radiochromic films
    Avanzo, Michele
    Drigo, Annalisa
    Kaiser, Stefano Ren
    Roggio, Antonella
    Sartor, Giovanna
    Chiovati, Paola
    Franchin, Giovanni
    Mascarin, Maurizio
    Capra, Elvira
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 29 (03): : 304 - 311
  • [2] Relationship Between Target Delineation and Surface Dose in Breast Radiotherapy Using Helical Tomotherapy
    Arslan, Suheyla Aytac
    Inan, Gonca Altinisik
    Aral, Ipek Pinar
    Celik, Selcan
    Karabuga, Havva
    Ozturk, H. Furkan
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2018, 28 (04): : 201 - 207
  • [3] TLD measurement to investigate the bolus effect on skin dose in total body irradiation with helical tomotherapy
    Alveroglu, Gokce Ucar
    Akbas, Canan Koksal
    Celtik, Inci Kingir
    Becerir, Hatice Bilge
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2024, 219
  • [4] Dose verification of virtual bolus application for helical tomotherapy
    Nwe, Saw Yu
    Chitapanarux, Imjai
    Nobnop, Wannapha
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2023, 48 (01) : 16 - 19
  • [5] TREATMENT PLANNING FOR PULSED REDUCED DOSE-RATE RADIOTHERAPY IN HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY
    Rong, Yi
    Paliwal, Bhudatt
    Howard, Steven P.
    Welsh, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (03): : 934 - 942
  • [6] Superficial Dosimetry for Helical Tomotherapy
    Kim, Song Yih
    You, Sei Hwan
    Song, Taesoo
    Kim, Yong Nam
    Keum, Ki Chang
    Cho, Jae Ho
    Lee, Chang Geol
    Seong, Jinsil
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 27 (02): : 103 - 110
  • [7] Dose calibration of nonconventional treatment systems applied to helical tomotherapy
    Jeraj, R
    Mackie, TR
    Balog, J
    Olivera, G
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (02) : 570 - 577
  • [8] Feasibility and sensitivity study of helical tomotherapy for dose painting plans
    Deveau, Michael A.
    Bowen, Stephen R.
    Westerly, David C.
    Jeraj, Robert
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2010, 49 (07) : 991 - 996
  • [9] Dose painting with IMPT, helical tomotherapy and IMXT: A dosimetric comparison
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Soukup, Martin
    Atber, Markus
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 86 (01) : 30 - 34
  • [10] Performance of independent dose calculation in helical tomotherapy: implementation of the MCSIM code
    Dzintars, Eric
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Mavroidis, Panayiotis
    Sadeghi, Amir
    Papanikolaou, Nikos
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2012, 35 (04) : 423 - 438