STUDY OF CREEP CAVITATION IN A STAINLESS STEEL WELDMENT USING SMALL ANGLE NEUTRON SCATTERING AND SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

被引:0
作者
Jazaeri, H. [1 ]
Bouchard, P. J. [1 ]
Hutchings, M. T. [1 ]
Lindner, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Mat Engn, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[2] Inst Laue Langevin, F-38042 Grenoble 9, France
来源
ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2014, VOL 6A | 2014年
关键词
PRESSURE-VESSEL; TEMPERATURE; PRECIPITATION; SUPERALLOY; STRESS; DAMAGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Strain-relief cracking, also referred to as reheat cracking, is a generic creep failure mode that has been observed in many welded stainless steel structures operating at high temperatures in UK nuclear power plant. One of the challenges currently faced by nuclear utility EDF Energy is the need to predict, with high certainty, the life-time of ageing engineering plant operating in the creep regime. A study of creep cavities near a reheat crack, similar to 28 mm long, in an AISI Type 316H austenitic stainless steel header is reported. The cracked component was removed after 65,000 hours operation at a mean temperature of 525 degrees C in a nuclear power plant. Creep cavities in the vicinity of the crack are observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and found to be mainly surrounding inter-granular carbides. Optimized metallographic and image analysis procedures are used to quantify the size and area fraction of creep cavities as a function of distance from the crack along a line normal to the crack face. Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) is used to quantify creep cavitation, averaged over a large gauge volume, similar to 20 mm(3), at similar positions normal to the crack line. A systematic increase in the true fractional size distribution of cavities is observed approaching the crack. The cavity size distribution peaks between 100-300 nm diameter and this correlates closely with the quantitative metallography results of cavities in this sample. SANS has the advantage of being non-destructive and also the examined volume is several mm(3), against an area of hundreds of mu m(2) in the case of SEM, therefore giving more statistically significant results. However the two techniques are complementary, as the detailed microscopic information from SEM is required to interpret the SANS data.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] SMALL-ANGLE NEUTRON-SCATTERING INVESTIGATION OF M23C6 PRECIPITATION IN AISI304 STAINLESS-STEEL
    BOEUF, A
    COPPOLA, R
    RUSTICHELLI, F
    ZAMBONARDI, F
    MELONE, S
    MAGGI, S
    PULITI, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 1981, 14 (OCT) : 337 - 344
  • [2] Boeuf A, 1982, P INT C MECH BEH NUC, P94
  • [3] Bouchard P. J., 2010, OUMATSENG003
  • [4] Quantification of creep cavitation damage around a crack in a stainless steel pressure vessel
    Bouchard, PJ
    Withers, PJ
    McDonald, SA
    Heenan, RK
    [J]. ACTA MATERIALIA, 2004, 52 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [5] Characterisation of creep cavitation damage in a stainless steel pressure vessel using small angle neutron scattering
    Bouchard, PJ
    Fiori, F
    Treimer, W
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSICS A-MATERIALS SCIENCE & PROCESSING, 2002, 74 (Suppl 1): : S1689 - S1691
  • [6] Burnett T. L., 2013, COMMUNICATION
  • [7] An improved method to identify grain boundary creep cavitation in 316H austenitic stainless steel
    Chen, B.
    Flewitt, P. E. J.
    Smith, D. J.
    Jones, C. P.
    [J]. ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2011, 111 (05) : 309 - 313
  • [8] Dhooge A., 1998, WELD WORLD, V41, P206
  • [9] DUSIC M, 1986, MATER SCI TECH SER, V2, P559, DOI 10.1179/026708386790329181
  • [10] Hutchings M.T., 2012, OUMATSENG025