Double-blind peer review and gender publication bias

被引：23
作者：
Engqvist, Leif [1 ]
Frommen, Joachim G. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Evolut Biol & Ecol, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
来源：
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR | 2008年 / 76卷
关键词：
effect size; gender bias; GLMM; refereeing process; sex difference;
D O I：
10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.023
中图分类号：
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号：
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要：
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码：E1 / E2
页数：2
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, NATURE, V451, P605
  • [2] Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
    Budden, Amber E.
    Tregenza, Tom
    Aarssen, Lonnie W.
    Koricheva, Julia
    Leimu, Roosa
    Lortie, Christopher J.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (01) : 4 - 6
  • [3] Who stands to lose from double-blind review?
    Garvalov, Boyan K.
    [J]. NATURE, 2008, 452 (7183) : 28 - 28
  • [4] Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fields
    Lane, David
    [J]. NATURE, 2008, 452 (7183) : 28 - 28
  • [5] US and non-US submissions - An analysis of reviewer bias
    Link, AM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03): : 246 - 247
  • [6] Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway
    Naqvi, K. Razi
    [J]. NATURE, 2008, 452 (7183) : 28 - 28
  • [7] Double-blind review: let diversity reign
    O'Hara, Bob
    [J]. NATURE, 2008, 452 (7183) : 28 - 28
  • [8] Gender bias in the refereeing process?
    Tregenza, T
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2002, 17 (08) : 349 - 350
  • [9] Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
    Wenneras, C
    Wold, A
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6631) : 341 - 343
1