Sedimentological and ichnological signatures of changes in wave, river and tidal influence along a Neogene tropical deltaic shoreline

被引:98
作者
Buatois, Luis A. [1 ]
Santiago, Nubia [2 ]
Herrera, Meylin [2 ]
Plink-Bjoerklund, Piret [3 ]
Steel, Ron [4 ]
Espin, Maria [5 ]
Parra, Kaolu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geol Sci, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada
[2] PDVSA, Div Oriente, Puerto La Cruz 6023, Venezuela
[3] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Geol & Geol Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] PDVSA, Div Oriente, Lab Geol El Chaure, Puerto La Cruz 6014, Venezuela
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Cenozoic; deltas; ichnology; rivers; tides; tropics; Venezuela; waves; ANIMAL-SUBSTRATE INTERACTIONS; SANTA-ROSITA FORMATION; ORINOCO DELTA; DEPOSITIONAL PROCESSES; LOWER ORDOVICIAN; COLUMBUS BASIN; TRACE FOSSILS; FACIES; ALBERTA; MARINE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3091.2011.01317.x
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Analysis of Neogene cores from the Eastern Venezuela Basin along 65 km of a westeast trending shoreline allows characterization of the sedimentological and ichnological signatures of wave, river and tidal processes. The area displays deltas prograding northward from the Guyana Shield. Twenty-three facies are defined and grouped into four categories (wave-influenced, river-influenced, tide-influenced and basinal). Wave-dominated deltaic deposits occur mostly in the Tacata Field. The delta plain was characterized by tide-influenced distributary channels separated by interdistributary bays. Fluvial discharge in the delta front and prodelta was repeatedly interrupted by storm-wave reworking and suspended sediment fallout. Delta-front and prodelta deposits contain some ichnotaxa that typically do not occur in brackish water (for example, Chondrites and Phycosiphon). Amalgamated storm deposits are unburrowed or contain vertical Ophiomorpha. Lateral (especially on the updrift side) to the river mouths, waves caused nearly continuous accretion of the associated strandplains. These deposits are the most intensely bioturbated, and are dominated by the estenohaline echinoid-generated ichnogenus Scolicia. River-dominated deltaic deposits are present in the Santa Barbara, Mulata, Carito and El Furrial Fields. Low-sinuosity rivers characterized the alluvial plain, whereas the subaerial delta plain was occupied by higher-sinuosity rivers. The subaqueous delta plain includes distributary channels and tide-influenced interdistributary bays. Further seaward, successions are characterized by terminal distributary-channel and distributary mouth-bar deposits, as well as by delta-front and prodelta deposits showing evidence of sediment gravity-flow and fluid-mud emplacement. Delta-front and prodelta deposits are unbioturbated to sparsely bioturbated, suggesting extreme stress, mostly as a result of high fluvial discharge and generation of sediment gravity flows. Tidal influence is restricted to interdistributary bays, lagoons and some distributary channels. From an ichnological perspective, and in order of decreasing stress levels, four main depositional settings are identified: river-dominated deltas, tide-influenced delta plains, wave-dominated deltas and wave-dominated strandplainoffshore complexes.
引用
收藏
页码:1568 / 1612
页数:45
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Aigner T., 1985, LECT NOTES EARTH SCI, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/BFB0011411
[2]   Dynamic spatial and temporal prediction of changes in depositional processes on clastic shorelines: Toward improved subsurface uncertainty reduction and management [J].
Ainsworth, R. Bruce ;
Vakarelov, Boyan K. ;
Nanson, Rachel A. .
AAPG BULLETIN, 2011, 95 (02) :267-297
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, FACIES MODELS 4
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SOILS INTRO PALEOPED
[5]  
Aslan A, 2003, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V115, P479, DOI 10.1130/0016-7606(2003)115<0479:HEOTWO>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   HYPERPYCNAL RIVERS AND PRODELTAIC SHELVES IN THE CRETACEOUS SEAWAY OF NORTH AMERICA [J].
Bhattacharya, Janok P. ;
MacEachern, James A. .
JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH, 2009, 79 (3-4) :184-209
[8]   Wave-influenced deltas: geomorphological implications for facies reconstruction [J].
Bhattacharya, JP ;
Giosan, L .
SEDIMENTOLOGY, 2003, 50 (01) :187-210
[9]   CLASSIFICATION OF CLASTIC COASTAL DEPOSITIONAL-ENVIRONMENTS [J].
BOYD, R ;
DALRYMPLE, R ;
ZAITLIN, BA .
SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY, 1992, 80 (3-4) :139-150
[10]  
Boyd R., 2010, FACIES MODELS 4, P265