Development of the short version of the Scales of General Well-Being: The 14-item SGWB

被引：29

作者：

Longo, Ylenio ^{[1
,3
]}

Coyne, Iain ^{[2
,4
]}

Joseph, Stephen ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England

[2] Loughborough Univ, Loughborough, Leics, England

[3] Univ Nottingham, Div Psychiat & Appl Psychol, Nottingham, England

[4] Loughborough Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Loughborough, Leics, England

来源：

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES | 2018年 / 124卷

基金：

英国经济与社会研究理事会;

关键词：

Well-being; Short form; SGWB; Flourishing; Measurement; Scale; Validation; Factor analysis;

D O I：

10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.042

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

The Scales of General Well-Being (SGWB, Longo, Coyne, & Joseph, 2017) is a 65-item tool assessing fourteen different constructs. The aim of this study was to develop a short 14-item version. One item was chosen from each of the fourteen scales following inspection of previously-published factor loadings and content validity ratings. In total, 446 responses from U.S residents were collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Results supported a factor structure consistent with the long form, as well as good internal consistency. Additionally, general well-being scores of short- and long-form correlated at 0.96 and each item in the short-form was strongly related to its respective long-form scale. The 14-item SGWB offers a brief assessment of well-being based on a novel and comprehensive operational definition, and promises to be of practical use to researchers and clinicians.

引用

页码：31 / 34

页数：4

共 15 条

[1]

Brown T. A., 2014, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR

[2] New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings [J].

Diener, Ed ;

Wirtz, Derrick ;

Tov, William ;

Kim-Prieto, Chu ;

Choi, Dong-won ;

Oishi, Shigehiro ;

Biswas-Diener, Robert .

SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2010, 97 (02) :143-156

[3]

Hair J. F., 2010, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN

[4] Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].

Hu, Li-tze ;

Bentler, Peter M. .

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55

[5] Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being [J].

Huppert, Felicia A. ;

So, Timothy T. C. .

SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2013, 110 (03) :837-861

[6] The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life [J].

Keyes, CLM .

JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 43 (02) :207-222

[7] Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time [J].

Linton, Myles-Jay ;

Dieppe, Paul ;

Medina-Lara, Antonieta .

BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (07)

[8] The scales of general well-being (SGWB) [J].

Longo, Ylenio ;

Coyne, Lain ;

Joseph, Stephen .

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 109 :148-159

[9] Development of a self-report measure of unconditional positive self-regard [J].

Patterson, Thomas G. ;

Joseph, Stephen .

PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2006, 79 :557-570

[10] Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk [J].

Peer, Eyal ;

Vosgerau, Joachim ;

Acquisti, Alessandro .

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (04) :1023-1031

← 1 2 →