Kenaf forage yield and quality under varying water availability

被引:14
|
作者
Nielsen, DC [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Cent Great Plains Res Stn, Akron, CO 80720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2004.0204
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A broadleaf forage crop grown in rotation with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) would diversify dryland crop rotations in the central Great Plains. Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) provides good quality livestock forage, but yield and quality have not been evaluated under varying water availability conditions. This study determined kenaf soil water extraction, plant height, regrowth following cutting, dry matter (DM) yield, and forage quality responses to varying water availability. Kenaf was planted on a Weld silt loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Aridic Argiustolls) under a line-source gradient irrigation system. Water conditions ranged from rainfed to full evapotranspiration replacement. Kenaf was harvested in early August and then again in October. Dry matter yield increased linearly with increases in available water and water use, with about 2000 kg ha(-1) DM yield produced with 274-mm water use increasing to 6000 kg ha(-1) with 507-mm water use. Crude protein (163 to 279 g kg(-1)) decreased with increasing water use. Neutral detergent fiber (229 to 478 g kg(-1)) and acid detergent fiber (168 to 314 g kg(-1)) increased with increasing water use. Total digestible nutrients (656 to 840 g kg(-1)) and relative feed value (range 130 to 308) decreased with increasing water use. For a given amount of water use, kenaf DM yield was lower than corn (Zea mays L.) silage, but kenaf crude protein production was higher than corn silage (73-215%). Kenaf appears to be a high quality livestock forage that has potential as both an irrigated or dryland crop in the central Great Plains.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 213
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Forage Yield and Quality Evaluation in Intercropping of Kochia, Sesbania and Guar under Saline Irrigation
    Ghaffarian, M. R.
    Yadavi, A.
    Nasab, A. Dabbagh Mohammadi
    Salehi, M.
    Dehnavi, M. Movahhedi
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 23 (01): : 149 - 165
  • [42] Forage Yield and the Quality of Perennial Legume-Grass Mixtures under Rainfed Conditions
    Albayrak, Sebahattin
    Turk, Mevlut
    Yuksel, Osman
    Yilmaz, Murat
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2011, 39 (01) : 114 - 118
  • [43] Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions
    Kir, Hakan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2021, 45 (03): : 419 - 426
  • [44] GROWTH, YIELD, AND QUALITY OF FORAGE MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES
    COX, WJ
    KALONGE, S
    CHERNEY, DJR
    REID, WS
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (02) : 341 - 347
  • [45] INFLUENCE OF THREE CUTTING SYSTEMS ON YIELD, WATER USE EFFICIENCY, AND FORAGE QUALITY OF SAINFOIN
    KOCH, DW
    HINZE, GO
    DOTZENKO, AD
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1972, 64 (04) : 463 - &
  • [46] Effects of Mowing on Forage Availability and Quality During the Summer
    Johnson, Michelle
    Jurak, Meghan
    Neira, Lucas T.
    McCann, Joshua C.
    Shike, Daniel W.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 226 - 226
  • [47] Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) forage yield and quality at three ages compared to corn and brown midrib sorghum x Sudangrass
    Reta Sanchez, David Guadalupe
    Cruz Cruz, Sarel
    Palomo Gil, Arturo
    Serrato Corona, J. Santos
    Cueto Wong, Jose Antonio
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2010, 1 (01): : 13 - 23
  • [48] FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF CEREALS AT MACKENZIE,PT
    MITCHELL, WW
    ALASKA AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN, 1983, (61): : 1 - 12
  • [49] GENETICS ANALYSIS OF FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY IN SORGHUM
    SINGHANIA, DL
    RATNALIKAR, VP
    GUPTA, SC
    SINGH, V
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 1977, 37 (02) : 235 - 240
  • [50] SELECTION FOR FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY IN CRIOULA ALFALFA
    DIASDEOLIVEIRA, PR
    PAIM, NR
    CZERMAINSKI, ABC
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1993, 28 (09) : 1039 - 1044