Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study

被引:9
作者
Crocker, Matthew [1 ]
Hutchinson, Claire [1 ]
Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine [1 ]
Walker, Ruth [2 ]
Chen, Gang [3 ]
Ratcliffe, Julie [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Hlth & Social Care Econ Grp, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Disabil & Community Inclus, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Caulfield, Vic 3145, Australia
关键词
Health economics; Economic evaluation; Disability; Preferences; Quality of life; OLDER-PEOPLE; PREFERENCES; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-021-01901-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In economic evaluation, the quality of life of people with a disability has traditionally been assessed using preference-based instruments designed to measure and value quality of life. To provide robust measurement of the effectiveness of programs designed to improve the quality of life of people living with a disability, preference-based measures need to be sufficiently sensitive to detect incremental changes in the quality of life dimensions that are most important to people who have a disability. This study sought to explore whether there was a difference in the ranked order of importance of quality of life dimensions between people with a disability and people without a disability. Methods An online survey was developed and administered Australia wide. The first sample (n = 410) comprised adults (aged >= 18 years) with a disability (n = 208) and family carers of person/s with a disability who were asked to respond on behalf of the person with a disability (n = 202). The second sample included adults without disability (n = 443). Respondents were asked to rank the importance of 12 quality of life dimensions extracted from the content of established preference-based quality of life measures (EQ-5D, AQoL and ASCOT). Results People with a disability placed relatively higher importance on broader quality of life dimensions (e.g. Control, Independence, Self-care) relative to health status focused dimensions (e.g. Vision, Hearing, Physical mobility). This distinction was less differentiable for those 'without a disability'. The biggest differences in ranked importance of dimensions were in: Vision ('with disability' = 10th, 'without disability' = 4th), Self-care ('with disability' = 3rd, 'without disability' = 7th) and Mental well-being ('with disability' = 6th, 'without disability' = 2nd). Conclusions The relative importance of quality of life dimensions for people with a disability differs to people without a disability. Quality of life is a key outcome for economic evaluation and for assessing the impact of disability care policy and practice in Australia and internationally. It is important that the effectiveness of interventions is measured and valued in ways which are fully reflective of the quality of life preferences of people with a disability.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 30 3 SECT RES CTR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, World Health Statistics 2020. Monitoring health for the SDGs
[3]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics,, 2018, SOC EC IND AR SEIFA
[4]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare,, 2020, PEOPL DIS AUSTR INC
[5]   Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in congenital mobility impairment: a systematic review of validity and responsiveness [J].
Bray, Nathan ;
Spencer, Llinos Haf ;
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor .
HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2020, 10 (01)
[6]  
Brazier J., 2007, MEASURING VALUING HL
[7]  
Bulmer M., 1967, Principles of Statistics
[8]   Relationship between Self-Report and Proxy Ratings on Assessed Personal Quality of Life-Related Outcomes [J].
Claes, Claudia ;
Vandevelde, Stijn ;
Van Hove, Geert ;
van Loon, Jos ;
Verschelden, Griet ;
Schalock, Robert .
JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2012, 9 (03) :159-165
[9]  
Commonwealth of Australia,, 2021, PORTF BUDG STAT 2021
[10]   Perceptions of staff and family of the quality of life of people with severe to profound intellectual disability [J].
de Geus-Neelen, Karin C. J. M. ;
van Oorsouw, Wietske M. W. J. ;
Hendriks, Lex A. H. C. ;
Embregts, Petri J. C. M. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2019, 44 (01) :42-50