Intraocular lens power calculation after refractive surgery

被引:61
作者
Argento, C
Cosentino, MJ
Badoza, D
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Inst Vis, RA-1122 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, Hosp Clin Jose San Martn, Sch Med, RA-1122 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00351-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the results of phacoemulsification cataract surgery in eyes that had had refractive surgery and to compare the predictability of various methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. Setting: Instituto de la Vision, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Methods: The study involved 7 cases that had phacoemulsification after radial keratotomy or laser in situ keratomileusis. The spherical equivalent (SE) and visual acuity were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively to assess the changes before cataract development. The IOL power calculated with conventional keratometry (CK), adjusted keratometry, the clinical history method (CHM), corneal topography (CT), and the contact lens method (CLM) was compared with the final refractive and keratometric results measured with the BackCalcs (Holladay((R)) IOL Consultant Program, Holladay Consulting, Inc.) to assess the accuracy and predictability of each method. Results: The mean SE was -4.82 diopters (D) +/- 5.13 (SD) before phacoemulsification and +0.19 +/- 1.01 D after phacoemulsification, and the mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.39 +/- 0.07 (20/50) and 0.80 +/- 0.06 (20/25), respectively. Conclusions: Post-phacoemulsification refraction in cases with previous refractive surgery appeared to be predictable when the appropriate calculation method was applied. When all the data were available, the CHM provided the best results. Adjusted keratometry and CT seemed to be more accurate than CK and the CLM. (C) 2003 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:1346 / 1351
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Alimisi S, 1996, J REFRACT SURG, V12, pS309
[2]   Laser in situ keratomileusis versus arcuate keratotomy to treat astigmatism [J].
Argento, C ;
Mendy, JF ;
Cosentino, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 25 (03) :374-382
[3]   Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia [J].
Argento, CJ ;
Cosentino, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 24 (08) :1050-1058
[4]   CALCULATION OF INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER AFTER RADIAL KERATOTOMY WITH COMPUTERIZED VIDEOKERATOGRAPHY [J].
CELIKKOL, L ;
PAVLOPOULOS, G ;
WEINSTEIN, B ;
CELIKKOL, G ;
FELDMAN, ST .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 120 (06) :739-750
[5]   COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF COMPUTERIZED VIDEOKERATOGRAPHY AND KERATOMETRY FOR USE IN INTRAOCULAR-LENS CALCULATIONS [J].
CUAYCONG, MJ ;
GAY, CA ;
EMERY, J ;
HAFT, EA ;
KOCH, DD .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 19 :178-181
[6]   Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power calculation after photorefractive keratectomy [J].
Gimbel, HV ;
Sun, R ;
Furlong, MT ;
van Westenbrugge, JA ;
Kassab, J .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (08) :1147-1151
[7]   Keratometric index, videokeratography, and refractive surgery [J].
Gobbi, PG ;
Carones, F ;
Brancato, R .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 24 (02) :202-211
[8]   A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis [J].
Hamed, AH ;
Wang, L ;
Misra, M ;
Koch, DD .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (04) :651-658
[9]  
HOFFER KJ, 1995, J REFRACT SURG, V11, P490
[10]  
Holladay JT, 1989, REFRACT CORNEAL SURG, V5, P203