State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems

被引:26
作者
Mustafa, Osama [1 ]
Barbosa, Andres [2 ]
Krause, Douglas J. [3 ]
Peter, Hans-Ulrich [4 ]
Vieira, Goncalo [5 ]
Ruemmler, Marie-Charlott [4 ]
机构
[1] Thuringian Inst Sustainabil & Climate Protect, Leutragraben 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat, Madrid, Spain
[3] NOAA, Antarctic Ecosyst Res Div, NMFS, SWFSC, La Jolla, CA USA
[4] Friedrich Schiller Univ, Inst Ecol & Evolut, Jena, Germany
[5] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Estudos Geog, IGOT, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
UAV; UAS; Drone; Survey technologies; Wildlife monitoring; Guidelines;
D O I
10.1007/s00300-018-2363-9
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The personal, commercial, and scientific use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in Antarctica has increased dramatically in recent years. Due to the potential benefits for, and negative impacts to, sensitive Antarctic wildlife, the use of UAS (also called unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) or drones) is a widely discussed topic. Accordingly, an assessment of the current state of UAS-wildlife response research and recommendations for future work is needed. This paper summarizes recent research and the expert opinion of several national Antarctic science programs in order to support Antarctic conservation policy discussions and inform forthcoming research. It encapsulates the current knowledge on the impact of UAS on Antarctic wildlife and the recommendations of the Action Group (AG) on 'Development of a satellite-based, Antarctic-wide, remote sensing approach to monitor bird and animal populations' of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) for the compilation of guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:2387 / 2398
页数:12
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] CEP, 2017, FORT ANT TREAT CONS, VI
  • [2] Gardner S, 2010, UNMANNED SYST, V29, P30
  • [3] A small unmanned aerial system for estimating abundance and size of Antarctic predators
    Goebel, Michael E.
    Perryman, Wayne L.
    Hinke, Jefferson T.
    Krause, Douglas J.
    Hann, Nancy A.
    Gardner, Steve
    LeRoi, Donald J.
    [J]. POLAR BIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (05) : 619 - 630
  • [4] Best practice for minimising unmanned aerial vehicle disturbance to wildlife in biological field research
    Hodgson, Jarrod C.
    Koh, Lian Pin
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (10) : R404 - R405
  • [5] International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO), 2016, 38 ATCM SANT CHIL 23
  • [6] Korczak-Abshire M, 2016, CCAMLR SCI, V23, P1
  • [7] An accurate and adaptable photogrammetric approach for estimating the mass and body condition of pinnipeds using an unmanned aerial system
    Krause, Douglas J.
    Hinke, Jefferson T.
    Perryman, Wayne L.
    Goebel, Michael E.
    LeRoi, Donald J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11):
  • [8] Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review
    Mulero-Pazmany, Margarita
    Jenni-Eiermann, Susanne
    Strebel, Nicolas
    Sattler, Thomas
    Jose Negro, Juan
    Tablado, Zulima
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [9] MUSTAFA O., 2017, Monitoring Penguin Colonies in the Antarctic Using Remote Sensing Data
  • [10] A protocol for the aerial survey of penguin colonies using UAVs
    Ratcliffe, Norman
    Guihen, Damien
    Robst, Jeremy
    Crofts, Sarah
    Stanworth, Andrew
    Enderlein, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS, 2015, 3 (03): : 95 - 101