Urban and rural household energy transition in Sub-Saharan Africa: Does spatial heterogeneity reveal the direction of the transition?

被引:32
作者
Emodi, Nnaemeka Vincent [1 ]
Haruna, Emmanuel Umoru [2 ,3 ]
Abdu, Nizam [4 ]
Morataya, Sergio David Aldana [5 ]
Dioha, Michael O. [6 ]
Abraham-Dukuma, Magnus C. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Int Cooperat Studies, Dept Econ Dev & Pol, Kobe, Japan
[3] Fed Minist Finance Budget & Natl Planning, Abuja, Nigeria
[4] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Private MailBag 70, Sandy Bay, Tas 7005, Australia
[5] Inst Nacl Electrificac, Rural Electrificat Management Off, 7a Ave 2-29,Zona 9, Guatemala City 01009, Guatemala
[6] Carnegie Inst Sci, Dept Global Ecol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Gisborne Dist Council, Sci & Strategy Hub, Gisborne 4010, New Zealand
[8] Univ Waikato, Fac Law, Ctr Environm, Resources & Energy Law CEREL, Hamilton, New Zealand
关键词
Reverse energy transition; Panel data; Geopolitical; Fuel choice; Energy ladder; Urban and rural households; COOKING FUEL CHOICE; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; DETERMINANTS; COUNTRIES; SUSTAINABILITY; ECONOMICS; PATTERNS; KEROSENE; INSIGHTS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113118
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Understanding the dynamic behaviour of Sub-Saharan African households as they move along the energy ladder is essential for the energy transition in developing countries. This study applies Fixed and Random effect panel data models to analyse the drivers of rural and urban households' energy transition in Nigeria from 2010 to 2018. The estimation results from the panel models with robust standard errors show that rural households tend to increase their expenses on fuel sources that potentially substitute the energy source whose prices have increased. However, there is no significant relationship between the price and expenditure on different fuels in urban households. Irrespective of spatiality, we find that aside from income - education, household size, and internet access are essential drivers of household fuel choices. More importantly, we find evidence of reverse energy transition. We argue that this reverse energy transition limits the shift to cleaner fuels and increases the economic vulnerabilities of rural households. Our analysis also reveals that Nigerians' preference for fuels is shifting to be price inelastic. We make a strong case for policies and interventions that raise household income, empower women, reduce the cost of living, and improve clean and affordable energy access to encourage energy transition.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 98 条
[41]   Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour [J].
Frederiks, Elisha R. ;
Stennerl, Karen ;
Hobman, Elizabeth V. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 41 :1385-1394
[42]   Analysis of spatial heterogeneity and driving factors of capital allocation efficiency in energy conservation and environmental protection industry under environmental regulation [J].
Geng, Chengxuan ;
Cui, Zongying .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 137
[43]  
Goswami A., 2017, INT J ENERGY SECT MA
[44]  
Goswami S., 2018, GROWING APPETITE CHA
[45]   Household fuel mixes in peri-urban and rural Ecuador: Explaining the context of LPG, patterns of continued firewood use, and the challenges of induction cooking [J].
Gould, Carlos F. ;
Schlesinger, Samuel B. ;
Molina, Emilio ;
Lorena Bejarano, M. ;
Valarezo, Alfredo ;
Jack, Darby W. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 136
[46]   The Household Cooking Sector in Nigeria: Environmental and Economic Sustainability Assessment429 [J].
Gujba, Haruna ;
Mulugetta, Yacob ;
Azapagic, Adisa .
RESOURCES-BASEL, 2015, 4 (02) :412-433
[47]   Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice [J].
Halaby, CN .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2004, 30 :507-544
[48]   Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala [J].
Heltberg, R .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 10 :337-361
[49]   Fuel switching: evidence from eight developing countries [J].
Heltberg, R .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (05) :869-887
[50]   Who is energy poor? Revisiting energy (in)security in the case of Nepal [J].
Herington, M. J. ;
Malakar, Y. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 21 :49-53