KAsH: A new tool to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with myocardial infarction

被引:1
作者
Monteiro, Joel Ponte [1 ]
Rodrigues, Ricardo Costa [1 ]
Neto, Micaela [1 ]
Sousa, Joao Adriano [1 ]
Mendonca, Flavio [1 ]
Serrao, Marco Gomes [1 ]
Santos, Nuno [1 ]
Silva, Bruno [1 ]
Faria, Ana Paula [1 ]
Pereira, Decio [1 ]
Henriques, Eva [1 ]
Freitas, Antonio Drumond [1 ]
Mendonca, Isabel [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Dr Nelio Mendonca, Serv Cardiol, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
关键词
Myocardial infarction; Prognosis; Mortality; Risk score; ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; RISK SCORE; INTERNATIONAL TRIAL; GLOBAL REGISTRY; ARTERY-DISEASE; MODEL; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.repc.2019.12.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Complex risk scores have limited applicability in the assessment of patients with myocardial infarction (MI). In this work, the authors aimed to develop a simple to use clinical score to stratify the in-hospital mortality risk of patients with MI at first medical contact. Methods: In this single-center prospective registry assessing 1504 consecutively admitted patients with MI, the strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality were selected through multivariate logistic regression. The KAsH score was developed according to the following formula: KAsH=(Killip class x Age x Heart rate)/systolic blood pressure. Its predictive power was compared to previously validated scores using the DeLong test. The score was categorized and further compared to the Killip classification. Results: The KAsH score displayed excellent predictive power for in-hospital mortality, superior to other well-validated risk scores (AUC: KAsH 0.861 vs. GRACE 0.773, p<0.001) and robust in subgroup analysis. KAsH maintained its predictive capacity after adjustment for multiple confounding factors such as diabetes, heart failure, mechanical complications and bleeding (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.001-1.008, p=0.012) and reclassified 81.5% of patients into a better risk category compared to the Killip classification. KAsH's categorization displayed excellent mortality discrimination (KAsH 1: 1.0%, KAsH 2: 8.1%, KAsH 3: 20.4%, KAsH 4: 55.2%) and better mortality prediction than the Killip classification (AUC: KAsH 0.839 vs. Killip 0.775, p<0.0001). Conclusion: KAsH, an easy to use score calculated at first medical contact with patients with MI, displays better predictive power for in-hospital mortality than existing scores. (C) 2019 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 688
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Amsterdam EA, 2014, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V64, P2713, DOI [10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.016, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.011, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134]
[2]  
[Anonymous], ANATOL J CARDIOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], JAMA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, J AM MED ASS
[5]   Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents [J].
Bennette, Caroline ;
Vickers, Andrew .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
[6]   Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation results from an international trial of 9461 patients [J].
Boersma, E ;
Pieper, KS ;
Steyerberg, EW ;
Wilcox, RG ;
Chang, WC ;
Lee, KL ;
Akkerhuis, KM ;
Harrington, RA ;
Deckers, JW ;
Armstrong, PW ;
Lincoff, AM ;
Califf, RM ;
Topol, EJ ;
Simoons, ML .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (22) :2557-2567
[7]  
Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.7326/M14-0698]
[8]   Risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: Risk scores, biomarkers and clinical judgment [J].
Corcoran, David ;
Grant, Patrick ;
Berry, Colin .
IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2015, 8 :131-137
[9]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[10]   A simple benchmark for evaluating quality of care of patients following acute myocardial infarction [J].
Dorsch, MF ;
Lawrance, RA ;
Sapsford, RJ ;
Oldham, J ;
Greenwood, DC ;
Jackson, BM ;
Morrell, C ;
Ball, SG ;
Robinson, MB ;
Hall, AS .
HEART, 2001, 86 (02) :150-154