On model specification and parameter space definitions in higher order spatial econometric models

被引:106
作者
Elhorst, J. Paul [2 ]
Lacombe, Donald J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Piras, Gianfranco [1 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Reg Res Inst, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] W Virginia Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[4] W Virginia Univ, Dept Econ, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
Higher order spatial models; Parameter space; Spatial econometrics; YARDSTICK COMPETITION; AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL; AUTOCORRELATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.09.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Higher-order spatial econometric models that include more than one weights matrix have seen increasing use in the spatial econometrics literature. There are two distinct issues related to the specification of these extended models. The first issue is what form the higher-order spatial econometric model takes, i.e. higher-order polynomials in the spatial weights matrices vs. higher-order spatial autoregressive processes. The second issue relates to the parameter space in such models and how this can affect the choice of model specification, estimation, and inference. We outline a procedure that is simple both mathematically and computationally for finding the stationary region for spatial econometric models with up to K weights matrices for higher-order spatial autoregressive processes. We also compare and contrast this approach with the parameter space for models that incorporate higher-order polynomials in the spatial weights matrices. Regardless of the model utilized in empirical practice, ignoring the relevant parameter region can lead to incorrect inferences regarding both the nature of the spatial autocorrelation process and the effects of changes in covariates on the dependent variable. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 220
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]   Tax mimicking and yardstick competition among local governments in the Netherlands [J].
Allers, MA ;
Elhorst, JP .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2005, 12 (04) :493-513
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Econom. Rev., DOI DOI 10.1081/ETC-120025891
[4]  
Anselin L., 2006, PALGRAVE HDB ECONOME, P901
[5]   Estimation of higher-order spatial autoregressive cross-section models with heteroscedastic disturbances [J].
Badinger, Harald ;
Egger, Peter .
PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 90 (01) :213-236
[6]  
BEACH C.M., 1978, J ECONOMETRICS, V7, P187
[7]   Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data [J].
Bell, KP ;
Bockstael, NE .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2000, 82 (01) :72-82
[8]   The influence of sample size on the degree of redundancy in spatial lag operators [J].
Blommestein, HJ ;
Koper, NAM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 82 (02) :317-333
[9]   In search of yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting [J].
Bordignon, M ;
Cerniglia, F ;
Revelli, F .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2003, 54 (02) :199-217
[10]   BIPARAMETRIC APPROACH TO SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION [J].
BRANDSMA, AS ;
KETELLAPPER, RH .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1979, 11 (01) :51-58