Uniform and non-uniform second-best input taxes

被引:25
作者
Claassen, R [1 ]
Horan, RD
机构
[1] USDA, Resource Econ Div, Econ Res Serv, Resource & Environm Policy Branch, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
equity; fertilizer tax; heterogeneity; input-based tax; nutrient runoff; nonpoint pollution; second-best;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011192110429
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate second-best, input-based taxes for agricultural nonpoint pollution control when market prices are endogenous and production is heterogeneous. Theoretically, we derive the optimal forms of taxes which take account of heterogeneity (non-uniform taxes) and a tax which does not (a uniform tax). Empirically, we use a multi-factor, market-equilibrium simulation model to determine optimal tax rates and associated equity effects, particularly differences in landowner gains/losses across a heterogeneous region. When market prices are endogenous, second-best tax policies result in pecuniary externalities that affect existing environmental externalities. In particular, the pecuniary externalities amplify the effect of producer heterogeneity on determination of sub-regional differences in tax rates and returns to land, particularly for the uniform policy. With endogenous prices, the uniform tax rate is considerably higher than any of the non-uniform rates and, ironically, the non-uniform taxes result in less dispersion of landowner gains across sub-regions than the uniform tax.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Abler D. G., 1992, European Review of Agricultural Economics, V19, P197, DOI 10.1093/erae/19.2.197
[2]   TECHNOLOGY AS AN AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION-CONTROL POLICY [J].
ABLER, DG ;
SHORTLE, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 77 (01) :20-32
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SOIL WATER QUALITY A, DOI DOI 10.17226/2132
[5]  
BINSWANGER HP, 1974, AM ECON REV, V64, P964
[6]  
BRADEN JB, 1993, THEORY MODELING EXPE
[7]  
CHAMBERS RG, 1993, AM J AGR ECON, V65, P761
[8]   ACREAGE DECISIONS UNDER RISK - THE CASE OF CORN AND SOYBEANS [J].
CHAVAS, JP ;
HOLT, MT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 72 (03) :529-538
[9]  
*COUNC AGR SCI TEC, 1999, 134 CAST
[10]   A unified approach to sensitivity analysis in equilibrium displacement models [J].
Davis, GC ;
Espinoza, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (04) :868-879