Comparison of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging results with postoperative pathologic results in early stage uterine cervical cancer

被引:6
作者
Dolgun, Z. N. [1 ]
Altintas, A. S. [1 ]
Ivan, C. [1 ]
Balkanli, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Fac, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Uterine cervical cancer; Tumor staging; Histopathology; CARCINOMA; FIGO;
D O I
10.12892/ejgo4064.2018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of early stage cervical cancer patients with their postoperative hystopathologic results. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study evaluating oncology charts of 30 early-stage cervical carcinoma patients who were diagnosed and underwent surgery between July 2006 to August 2011 at the present institution. Preoperative MRI staging, clinical staging, and histopathologic staging results were compared. Results: Seven patients had clinically correct stage and 20 patients had correct MRI staging according to histopathology. MRI staging revealed 66% sensitivity and it was strongly correlated with pathologic staging. Cervical ring invasion was present in 20 patients pathologically, whereas 13 patients were diagnosed positive on MRI evaluation. Among ten patients without cervical ring invasion, MRI diagnosed six of them correctly. Of the 11 positive parametrial invasion patients diagnosed pathologically, MRI ruled out only seven of them. Conclusion: Preoperative MRI staging might be a better tool to stage cervical cancer than clinical staging. MRI evaluates parametrial invasion and cervical ring involvement appropriately.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 938
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, 2014, CANC FACTS FIG 2015
[2]  
Benedet JL., 2000, Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines of gynaecological cancers, V2nd
[3]   The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma [J].
Boss, EA ;
Barentsz, JO ;
Massuger, LFAG ;
Boonstra, H .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (02) :256-270
[4]   Medical progress - Cancer of the uterine cervix [J].
Cannistra, SA ;
Niloff, JM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (16) :1030-1038
[5]   Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma - Results of prospective study [J].
Choi, SH ;
Kim, SH ;
Choi, HJ ;
Park, BK ;
Lee, HJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2004, 28 (05) :620-627
[6]   Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: Correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management [J].
Dhoot, Nilu Malpani ;
Kumar, Vinay ;
Shinagare, Atul ;
Kataki, Amal Chandra ;
Barmon, Debabrata ;
Bhuyan, Utpal .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 56 (01) :58-65
[7]   Radiology in invasive cervical cancer [J].
Hricak, H ;
Yu, KK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (05) :1101-1108
[8]   Cervical Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J].
Koh, Wui-Jin ;
Greer, Benjamin E. ;
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. ;
Apte, Sachin M. ;
Campos, Susana M. ;
Chan, John ;
Cho, Kathleen R. ;
Cohn, David ;
Crispens, Marta Ann ;
DuPont, Nefertiti ;
Eifel, Patricia J. ;
Gaffney, David K. ;
Giuntoli, Robert L., II ;
Han, Ernest ;
Huh, Warner K. ;
Lurain, John R., III ;
Martin, Lainie ;
Morgan, Mark A. ;
Mutch, David ;
Remmenga, Steven W. ;
Reynolds, R. Kevin ;
Small, William, Jr. ;
Teng, Nelson ;
Tillmanns, Todd ;
Valea, Fidel A. ;
McMillian, Nicole R. ;
Hughes, Miranda .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2013, 11 (03) :320-343
[9]   Evaluation of Gynecologic Cancer with MR Imaging, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and PET/MR Imaging [J].
Lee, Susanna I. ;
Catalano, Onofrio A. ;
Dehdashti, Farrokh .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03) :436-443
[10]   Pre- and post-operative work-up in patients affected by early cervical cancer and eligible for fertility-sparing treatment: role of MRI with saline hydrocolpos [J].
Marchiole, Pierangelo ;
Cittadini, Giuseppe ;
Sala, Paolo ;
Moioli, Melita ;
Mathevet, Patrice ;
Capaccio, Enrico ;
Costantini, Sergio .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2010, 35 (03) :271-279