A Review and Classification of Approaches for Dealing with Uncertainty in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Healthcare Decisions

被引:87
作者
Broekhuizen, Henk [1 ]
Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M. [1 ]
van Til, Janine A. [1 ]
Hummel, J. Marjan [1 ]
IJzerman, Maarten J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, MIRA Inst, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; BENEFIT-RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; ANALYSIS MCDA; MAKING MODEL; SELECTION; INFORMATION; ELICITATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-014-0251-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is increasingly used to support decisions in healthcare involving multiple and conflicting criteria. Although uncertainty is usually carefully addressed in health economic evaluations, whether and how the different sources of uncertainty are dealt with and with what methods in MCDA is less known. The objective of this study is to review how uncertainty can be explicitly taken into account in MCDA and to discuss which approach may be appropriate for healthcare decision makers. A literature review was conducted in the Scopus and PubMed databases. Two reviewers independently categorized studies according to research areas, the type of MCDA used, and the approach used to quantify uncertainty. Selected full text articles were read for methodological details. The search strategy identified 569 studies. The five approaches most identified were fuzzy set theory (45 % of studies), probabilistic sensitivity analysis (15 %), deterministic sensitivity analysis (31 %), Bayesian framework (6 %), and grey theory (3 %). A large number of papers considered the analytic hierarchy process in combination with fuzzy set theory (31 %). Only 3 % of studies were published in healthcare-related journals. In conclusion, our review identified five different approaches to take uncertainty into account in MCDA. The deterministic approach is most likely sufficient for most healthcare policy decisions because of its low complexity and straightforward implementation. However, more complex approaches may be needed when multiple sources of uncertainty must be considered simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 455
页数:11
相关论文
共 82 条
[61]   Stochastic multi-attribute analysis (SMAA) as an interpretation method for comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA) [J].
Prado-Lopez, Valentina ;
Seager, Thomas P. ;
Chester, Mikhail ;
Laurin, Lise ;
Bernardo, Melissa ;
Tylock, Steven .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (02) :405-416
[62]   Deliberative multicriteria evaluation [J].
Proctor, W ;
Drechsler, M .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2006, 24 (02) :169-190
[63]  
Rafiee R., 2011, SCI RES ESSAYS, V6, P4442
[64]   Evaluating future scenarios for the power generation sector using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tool: The Portuguese case [J].
Ribeiro, Fernando ;
Ferreira, Paula ;
Araujo, Madalena .
ENERGY, 2013, 52 :126-136
[65]   A novel computer based expert decision making model for prostate cancer disease management [J].
Richman, MB ;
Forman, EH ;
Bayazit, Y ;
Einstein, DB ;
Resnick, MI ;
Stovsky, MD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (06) :2310-2318
[66]   THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS - WHAT IT IS AND HOW IT IS USED [J].
SAATY, RW .
MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1987, 9 (3-5) :161-176
[67]   Robustness of AHP in selecting wastewater treatment method for the coloured metal industry: Serbian case study [J].
Srdjevic, Zorica ;
Samardzic, Milica ;
Srdjevic, Bojan .
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 29 (02) :147-161
[68]  
Srivastava Rajendra P., 2011, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, V12, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.accinf.2010.12.003
[69]   A stochastic multicriteria model for evidence-based decision making in drug benefit-risk analysis [J].
Tervonen, Tommi ;
van Valkenhoef, Gert ;
Buskens, Erik ;
Hillege, Hans L. ;
Postmus, Douwe .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (12) :1419-1428
[70]   Decision Making Under Uncertainty-An Example for Seismic Risk Management [J].
Tesfamariam, Solomon ;
Sadiq, Rehan ;
Najjaran, Homayoun .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (01) :78-94