Weed Occurrence in Sugar Beet Crop under Mulching and Organic Fertilization

被引:3
|
作者
Sediyama, M. A. N. [1 ]
Santos, M. R. [2 ]
Vidigal, S. M. [1 ]
Santos, I. C. [3 ]
Salgado, L. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] EPAMIG Zona Mata, BR-36570000 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] EPAMIG SM FERN, BR-36301360 Sao Joao Del Rei, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Piaui UESPI, Nucleo Urucui, BR-64860000 Urucui, PI, Brazil
关键词
Beta vulgaris; suppression; swine manure; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582010000400003
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Soil covering is an important practice in vegetable production, also helping in weed control. There is almost no research involving alternative weed control in sugar beet and few herbicides are suitable for this crop. This work aimed to evaluate the effect of mulching using coffee husk and sugarcane bagasse, and doses of swine culture waste water sedimentation pond sludge on weed incidence and yield of sugar beet cultivar Early Wonder. The experiment, carried out at the EPAMIG Experimental Farm in Oratorios-MG, was arranged as a split-plot in a randomized block design with four replications. The plots consisted of three types of cover crops: sugarcane bagasse, coffee husk and no cover, and the split-plots of five doses of sludge from swine wastewater sedimentation pond (0, 10, 20, 40 and 60 t ha(-1)). At 45 days after seedling transplanting (DAT), the weed population was evaluated and at 70 DAT, harvest was carried out. Coffee husk and sugarcane bagasse were effective in reducing the total fresh weight of weeds, mainly because of the suppressive effect of mulching on dicotyledonous weeds. Nut grass (Cyperus rotundus) dry mass increased with coffee husk, while dry mass of other monocots showed no difference among the three treatments. Increasing doses of sludge caused a linear reduction in the dry mass of monocots, except of nut grass. Coffee husk mulching provided the highest root unit weight and increased commercial root yield, regardless of the sludge doses.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 725
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sugar Beet as an Energy Crop
    Lee Panella
    Sugar Tech, 2010, 12 : 288 - 293
  • [32] Change of the weed species in sugar beet
    Fronek, D
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 1996, 112 (04): : 104 - 107
  • [33] CROP HUSBANDRY IN SUGAR BEET
    EDENS, FJ
    LANDBOUWMECHANISATIE, 1968, 19 (04): : 359 - &
  • [34] EFFECT OF MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION ON TECHNOLOGICAL VALUE OF SUGAR-BEET
    PRUGAR, J
    ROB, H
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1976, 22 (08): : 847 - 860
  • [35] THE INFLUENCE OF ORGANIC AND MINERAL FERTILIZATION ON SUGAR BEET CULTURE IN COVASNA COUNTY
    Popa, Bianca-Ana Maria
    Mihalache, Mircea
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2024, 67 (02): : 352 - 356
  • [36] Sustainability of the Sugar Beet Crop
    Stevanato, Piergiorgio
    Chiodi, Claudia
    Broccanello, Chiara
    Concheri, Giuseppe
    Biancardi, Enrico
    Pavli, Ouriana
    Skaracis, George
    SUGAR TECH, 2019, 21 (05) : 703 - 716
  • [37] GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WEED BEET OCCURRENCE
    Vostrovsky, Vaclav
    Stusek, Jaroslav
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2011, 127 (03): : 100 - 104
  • [38] ELECTROTHERMAL CONTROL OF WEED BEET AND BOLTING SUGAR-BEET
    DIPROSE, MF
    BENSON, FA
    HACKAM, R
    WEED RESEARCH, 1980, 20 (05) : 311 - 322
  • [39] WEED DIVERSITY AND TENDENCY OF WEED SPREAD IN SUGAR BEET STANDS
    Hunkova, Elena
    Demjanova, Eva
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2013, 129 (5-6): : 166 - 170
  • [40] INFLUENCE OF CROP SEQUENCE NITROGEN FERTILIZER AND HERBICIDES ON WEED SEED POPULATIONS IN SUGAR BEET FIELDS
    DOTZENKO, AD
    OZKAN, M
    STORER, KR
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1969, 61 (01) : 34 - &