Weed Occurrence in Sugar Beet Crop under Mulching and Organic Fertilization

被引:3
|
作者
Sediyama, M. A. N. [1 ]
Santos, M. R. [2 ]
Vidigal, S. M. [1 ]
Santos, I. C. [3 ]
Salgado, L. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] EPAMIG Zona Mata, BR-36570000 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] EPAMIG SM FERN, BR-36301360 Sao Joao Del Rei, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Piaui UESPI, Nucleo Urucui, BR-64860000 Urucui, PI, Brazil
关键词
Beta vulgaris; suppression; swine manure; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582010000400003
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Soil covering is an important practice in vegetable production, also helping in weed control. There is almost no research involving alternative weed control in sugar beet and few herbicides are suitable for this crop. This work aimed to evaluate the effect of mulching using coffee husk and sugarcane bagasse, and doses of swine culture waste water sedimentation pond sludge on weed incidence and yield of sugar beet cultivar Early Wonder. The experiment, carried out at the EPAMIG Experimental Farm in Oratorios-MG, was arranged as a split-plot in a randomized block design with four replications. The plots consisted of three types of cover crops: sugarcane bagasse, coffee husk and no cover, and the split-plots of five doses of sludge from swine wastewater sedimentation pond (0, 10, 20, 40 and 60 t ha(-1)). At 45 days after seedling transplanting (DAT), the weed population was evaluated and at 70 DAT, harvest was carried out. Coffee husk and sugarcane bagasse were effective in reducing the total fresh weight of weeds, mainly because of the suppressive effect of mulching on dicotyledonous weeds. Nut grass (Cyperus rotundus) dry mass increased with coffee husk, while dry mass of other monocots showed no difference among the three treatments. Increasing doses of sludge caused a linear reduction in the dry mass of monocots, except of nut grass. Coffee husk mulching provided the highest root unit weight and increased commercial root yield, regardless of the sludge doses.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 725
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Yield and nutrient export of sugar beet under mulching and organic fertilization
    Sediyama, Maria A. N.
    Santos, Marlei R.
    Vidigal, Sanzio M.
    Salgado, Luis T.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2011, 15 (09): : 883 - 889
  • [2] THE IMPACT OF WEED CONTROL METHODS ON SUGAR BEET CROP
    Romaneckas, Kestutis
    Adamaviciene, Aida
    Eimutyte, Edita
    Balandaite, Jovita
    Jasinskas, Algirdas
    PROCEEDING OF 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING 2019, 2019, : 459 - 463
  • [3] Oil rape - Undesired weed in sugar beet crop
    Danovska, A
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 1996, 112 (03): : 69 - 71
  • [4] Weed Suppression and Early Sugar Beet Development under Different Cover Crop Mulches
    Kunz, Christoph
    Sturm, Dominic J.
    Soekefeld, Markus
    Gerhards, Roland
    PLANT PROTECTION SCIENCE, 2017, 53 (03) : 187 - 193
  • [5] EFFECT OF FERTILIZATION AND CROP ROTATION ON YIELDS AND SUGAR CONTENT OF SUGAR BEET
    Hlisnikovsky, Lukas
    Kunzova, Eva
    Klir, Jan
    Hejcman, Michal
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2014, 130 (02): : 50 - 56
  • [6] INFLUENCE OF CROP ROTATION ON ACTUAL WEED INFESTATION OF SUGAR BEET
    Winkler, Jan
    Hledik, Pavel
    Prochazkova, Blanka
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2015, 131 (5-6): : 162 - 166
  • [7] THE EFFECT OF NITROGENOUS FERTILIZATION ON THE YIELDS OF REFINED SUGAR IN SUGAR-BEET CROP
    CHOCHOLA, J
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1987, 33 (08): : 865 - 874
  • [8] Annual broad leaved weed control in the British sugar beet crop
    Chambers, Pamela A.
    INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2022, 124 (1482): : 388 - 392
  • [9] WEED BEET AND SUGAR BEET - BEET VERSUS BEET
    Toth, Stefan
    Porvaz, Pavol
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2013, 129 (04): : 137 - 139
  • [10] Occurrence of Weed Species under Crop Succession
    Concenco, G.
    Ceccon, G.
    Correia, I. V. T.
    Leite, L. F.
    Alves, V. B.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2013, 31 (02) : 359 - 368