Does drug education work?

被引:14
作者
Midford, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Natl Drug Res Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
drug education; evaluation; school;
D O I
10.1080/713659427
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent research indicates that certain drug education programmes do stop or delay the onset of drug use under optimum conditions. Social inoculation programmes have generally enjoyed the greatest degree of success, but the behaviour changes have been confined to a small number of students; have not been uniform across all drugs and have diminished over time. Research on the cost effectiveness of drug education programmes indicates that they compare favourably with the cost effectiveness of most law enforcement approaches, but are not as cost effective as treatment. While there are some methodological qualifications, the drug education literature does indicate that soundly conceptualized and rigorously implemented programmes can influence drug using behaviour and that comprehensive provision of such programmes is likely to produce a net social cost saving to society. This does not mean that proven drug education programs will necessarily be implemented. The most powerful factor in the implementation process is selection of programmes on the basis of ideal outcomes, rather than on the evidence of what can realistically be achieved. Ultimately, this is self-defeating, because programme failures will again discredit the whole drug education approach. Drug education programmes must be selected because they have demonstrated the ability to have a beneficial impact on youth drug use and youth drug problems.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 446
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Does Studying Latin in Secondary Education Predict Study Achievement in Academic Higher Education? [J].
Hauspie, Cathy ;
Schelfhout, Stijn ;
Dirix, Nicolas ;
Fonteyne, Lot ;
Janse, Mark ;
Szmalec, Arnaud ;
Vereeck, Alexandra ;
Duyck, Wouter .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2024, 74 (04) :853-883
[32]   Policy practice in social work education: A literature review [J].
Weiss-Gal, Idit .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE, 2016, 25 (03) :290-303
[33]   Teacher's work evaluation as an element of education quality [J].
Bulska, Joanna .
NEW EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2008, 14 (01) :219-224
[34]   The 'losers' in education, work and life chances - the case of Finland [J].
Rinne, Risto ;
Jarvinen, Tero .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGIK, 2010, 56 (04) :512-530
[35]   Sustaining interdisciplinary work in trauma-informed education [J].
Krishnamoorthy, Govind ;
Ayre, Kay .
AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2022, 49 (03) :529-546
[36]   Education, opportunity and the future of work in the fourth industrial revolution [J].
Brown, Phillip .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2024, 45 (04) :475-493
[37]   Does public expenditure management matter for education outcomes? [J].
Boateng, Nana Adowaa .
DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2014, 31 (04) :535-552
[38]   Promotion of students' mastery goal orientations: does TARGET work? [J].
Lueftenegger, Marko ;
van de Schoot, Rens ;
Schober, Barbara ;
Finsterwald, Monika ;
Spiel, Christiane .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 34 (04) :451-469
[39]   The reliability of drug use data collected in the classroom: what is the problem, why does it matter and how should it be approached? [J].
McCambridge, Jim ;
Strang, John .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2006, 25 (05) :413-418
[40]   Preteenage drug use in Australia: The key predictors and school-based drug education [J].
Hawthorne, G .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1997, 20 (05) :384-395