18-fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of infection in the postoperative spine

被引:80
作者
De Winter, F
Gemmel, F
Van De Wiele, C
Poffijn, B
Uyttendaele, D
Dierckx, R
机构
[1] State Univ Ghent Hosp, Div Nucl Med, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Aalst OLV Hosp, Div Nucl Med, Aalst, Belgium
[3] State Univ Ghent Hosp, Dept Orthoped, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
spine; spondylitis; postoperative complications; prosthesis-related infections; radionuclide imaging; tomography; emission-computed; fluorodeoxyglucose F 18;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200306150-00017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Using conventional imaging methods, including magnetic resonance imaging and labeled leukocyte scanning, the diagnosis of infection in the postoperative spine remains a diagnostic challenge. Recently, promising results have been reported using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for various infectious problems. This study aimed to investigate the value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients suspected of having spinal infection after previous surgery of the spine. Methods. Fifty-seven consecutive patients with a history of previous spinal surgery were prospectively included between February 1999 and June 2001. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was performed 60 to 90 minutes after injection of 370 MBq 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. Images were scored visually and semiquantitatively by two blinded, independent, certified nuclear medicine physicians, experienced with positron emission tomography. Differences were assessed by consensus. Results were correlated with final diagnosis allowing calculation of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to find optimal cut-off values. Results. Fifteen patients had spinal infection. Using the most sensitive cut-off values sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 100%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, for both visual and semiquantitative scoring. In the group without metallic implants (n = 27), false positives (n = 2) only occurred in the first 6 months after surgery. In the group with metallic implants (n = 30), false positives (n = 6) were not confined to recently operated patients. Conclusions. Overall accuracy was excellent (86%) with a negative predictive value of 100%. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography holds promise to become the standard imaging technique in this difficult patient population, as it is straightforward, provides a rapid result (2 hours) and because accurate alternatives are lacking.
引用
收藏
页码:1314 / 1319
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Aydinli U, 1999, Acta Orthop Belg, V65, P182
[2]  
Bakheet SM, 1998, SEMIN NUCL MED, V28, P352
[3]  
CRIM JR, 1994, CRIT REV DIAGN IMAG, V35, P201
[4]   Aseptic loosening of a knee prosthesis as imaged on FDG positron emission tomography [J].
De Winter, F ;
Van de Wiele, C ;
De Clercq, D ;
Vogelaers, D ;
De Bondt, P ;
Dierckx, RA .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 25 (11) :923-923
[5]   High F-18FDG uptake in a paraspinal textiloma [J].
De Winter, F ;
Huysse, W ;
De Paepe, P ;
Lambert, B ;
Poffyn, B ;
Dierckx, R .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (02) :132-133
[6]   Promising role of 18-F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in clinical infectious diseases [J].
De Winter, F ;
Vogelaers, D ;
Gemmel, F ;
Dierckx, RA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 21 (04) :247-257
[7]   Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography: A highly accurate imaging modality for the diagnosis of chronic musculoskeletal infections [J].
De Winter, F ;
Van de Wiele, C ;
Vogelaers, D ;
De Smet, K ;
Verdonk, R ;
Dierckx, RA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (05) :651-660
[8]  
Delbeke D, 1999, J NUCL MED, V40, P1706
[9]  
Grane P, 1998, ACTA RADIOL, V39, P108
[10]   18F-FDG hybrid PET in patients with suspected spondylitis [J].
Gratz, S ;
Dörner, J ;
Fischer, U ;
Behr, TM ;
Béhé, M ;
Altenvoerde, G ;
Meller, J ;
Grabbe, E ;
Becker, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (04) :516-524