Safety and Efficacy of Single-Port Laparoscopic Ileostomy in Palliative Settings

被引:1
|
作者
Kang, Seng-Muk [1 ]
Cho, Jung Rae [1 ]
Oh, Heung-Kwon [1 ]
Lee, Eun-Ju [1 ]
Kim, Min Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Duck-Woo [1 ]
Kang, Sung-Bum [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seongnam, South Korea
关键词
Single-port laparoscopic ileostomy; Postoperative complications; Safety; Palliative surgery; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; STANDARDIZED TECHNIQUE; STOMA CREATION; BODY-IMAGE; INCISION; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; APPENDECTOMY; EXPERIENCE; COLECTOMY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3393/ac.2019.04.25
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Single-port laparoscopic techniques can be optimized with confined incisions. This approach has an intraoperative advantage of excellent visualization of the correct intestinal segment for exteriorization, along with direct visual control of the extraction to avoid twisting. However, only a few studies have verified the efficacy of the technique. Thus, this study assessed the results of single-port laparoscopic stoma creation for fecal diversion, specifically focusing on feasibility, safety, and efficacy. Methods: Patients who underwent single-incision enterostomy performed by a single surgeon were included. Data on demographics, indications for and chosen procedure, and operation results were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: Between April 2015 and January 2018, a total of 13 patients (8 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 57.7 years (range, 41-83 years) underwent single-port ileostomy creation. The most common reason for diversion was palliative ileostomy for colon obstruction or fistula from peritoneal malignancy (n = 12), followed by colonic fistula with necrotizing pancreatitis (n = 1). There were no cases of conversion to open or multiport laparoscopic surgery. The mean operative time was 54 minutes (range, 37-118 minutes), and the median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range, 2-211 days). A postoperative complication, aspiration pneumonia, was documented in 1 patient and treated conservatively. The mean duration of bowel movement was 0.7 days (range, 0-4 days). All stomas had good function, and there was no 30-day mortality. Conclusion: Single-port laparoscopic ileostomy in patients with a palliative setting could be a safe and feasible option for fecal diversion.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 21
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current advances in single-port laparoscopic surgery
    Carus, Th
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2013, 398 (07) : 925 - 929
  • [42] Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomyScarless cholecystectomy
    Tae Ho Hong
    Young Kyoung You
    Keun Ho Lee
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23
  • [43] Single-Port Versus 4-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Dionigi, Gianlorenzo
    Rausei, Stefano
    Dionigi, Renzo
    Boni, Luigi
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (01) : E10 - E10
  • [44] Single-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Difficulty Score
    Wiwanitkit, Somsri
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (03): : 329 - 329
  • [45] Appendectomy with Single-Port laparoscopic transumbilical surgery
    Ekci, Baki
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2011, 82 (05) : 421 - 425
  • [46] Single-port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid volvulus
    Byung Jo Choi
    Won Jun Jeong
    Say-June Kim
    Sang Chul Lee
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, (08) : 2381 - 2386
  • [47] SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC EXTRAPERITONEAL PARAAORTIC LYMPHADENECTOMY
    Iacoponi, S.
    Zapardiel, I.
    Diestro, M.
    Hernandez, A.
    De Santiago, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)
  • [48] Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic
    Gungor M.
    Kahraman K.
    Dursun P.
    Ozbasli E.
    Genim C.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12 (1) : 87 - 92
  • [49] Single-port robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery
    Spinoglio, G.
    Lenti, L. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (02) : 3 - 4
  • [50] Single-Port Laparoscopic Umbilical Hernia Repair
    Roberts, Kurt E.
    Panait, Lucian
    Duffy, Andrew J.
    Bell, Robert L.
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2010, 17 (03) : 256 - 260