Detection performance study for cone-beam differential phase contrast CT

被引:5
作者
Li, Ke [1 ]
Bevins, Nicholas [1 ]
Zambelli, Joseph [1 ]
Qi, Zhihua [1 ]
Chen, Guang-Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53705 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING | 2012年 / 8313卷
关键词
Phase contrast; Noise power spectrum; ROC; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; EFFICIENCY; SIGNAL;
D O I
10.1117/12.911593
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
X-ray phase sensitive imaging methods have seen tremendous growth and increased interest in recent years. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, but all have shown the ability to improve the detection of various objects because of the additional phase measurements. Of the various methods, grating-based differential phase contrast computed tomography (DPC-CT) imaging has shown greater quantitative and diagnostic capabilities than traditional absorption CT. Although it has been shown that DPC-CT provides superior contrast of certain materials, one question has not been fully addressed to date is whether DPC-CT can provide improved accuracy in detecting low contrast masses using the same radiation dose as that given in absorption CT. The detectability is not only related to contrast to noise ratio, but also to the noise texture. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the peculiar noise texture found in cone-beam DPC-CT affects low contrast objects' detectability through human observer ROC analysis. Studies for both axial and sagittal planes were carried out, as both could potentially be used in clinical practice for a 3D image. The results demonstrate that noise texture found in conebeam DPC-CT strongly affects human visual perception, and that object detectabilities in axial and sagittal images of DPC-CT are different.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Scaling law for noise variance and spatial resolution in differential phase contrast computed tomography [J].
Chen, Guang-Hong ;
Zambelli, Joseph ;
Li, Ke ;
Bevins, Nicholas ;
Qi, Zhihua .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (02) :584-588
[2]   X-ray Phase Sensitive Imaging Methods: Basic Physical Principles and Potential Medical Applications [J].
Chen, Guang-Hong ;
Zambelli, Joseph ;
Bevins, Nicholas ;
Qi, Zhihua ;
Li, Ke .
CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS, 2010, 6 (02) :90-99
[3]  
Cheney G, 2011, INT COMMUN ASSOC HAN, P1
[4]   A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging [J].
Gong, X ;
Glick, SJ ;
Liu, B ;
Vedula, AA ;
Thacker, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (04) :1041-1052
[5]  
HANSON K M, 1979, Medical Physics (Woodbury), V6, P441, DOI 10.1118/1.594534
[6]   X-RAY CHARACTERIZATION OF NORMAL AND NEOPLASTIC BREAST TISSUES [J].
JOHNS, PC ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1987, 32 (06) :675-695
[7]   Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets [J].
Metz, CE ;
Herman, BA ;
Roe, CA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (01) :110-121
[8]  
METZ CE, 1986, INVEST RADIOL, V21, P720, DOI 10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009
[9]   Analytical evaluation of the signal and noise propagation in x-ray differential phase-contrast computed tomography [J].
Raupach, Rainer ;
Flohr, Thomas G. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (07) :2219-2244
[10]   NEQ and task in dual-energy imaging: From cascaded systems analysis to human observer performance [J].
Richard, Samuel ;
Siewerdsen, Jeffrey H. ;
Tward, Daniel J. .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6913