The use of a negative pressure wound management system in perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer

被引:17
作者
Sumrien, H. [1 ]
Newman, P. [1 ]
Burt, C. [1 ]
McCarthy, K. [1 ]
Dixon, A. [1 ]
Pullyblank, A. [1 ]
Lyons, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southmead Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
ELAPE; Perineal wounds; Negative pressure therapy; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS FLAP; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; HERNIA REPAIR; PELVIC FLOOR; RECONSTRUCTION; THERAPY; EXPERIENCE; RESECTION; STANDARD; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-016-1495-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Perineal wound healing is a significant challenge after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) due to a high rate of wound breakdown. Negative pressure therapy has proven benefits in open wounds, and recently a negative pressure system has been developed for use on closed wounds at high risk of breakdown, such as apronectomy and hysterectomy. The aim of the present study was to determine whether negative pressure therapy applied to closed perineal wounds after ELAPE improved wound healing and compare outcomes to the published literature and outcomes from a historical cohort of patients who had undergone 'standard' abdominoperineal resection (APR) and primary closure of the perineal wounds. Prospective data on consecutive patients having ELAPE in the period from November 2012 to April 2015 were collected. The pelvic floor defect was reconstructed with biologic mesh. The adipose tissue layer was closed with vicryl sutures, a suction drain was left in the deep layer, the subcuticular layer and skin were closed, and the negative pressure system was applied. Any wound breakdown within the first 30 days postoperatively was recorded. Of the 32 consecutive ELAPE patients whose perineal wounds were closed within 30 days with the use of the negative pressure system, there was 1 patient with major perineal wound breakdown and 2 patients with a 1 cm superficial wound defect, which needed no further treatment. In the remaining 29 (90 %) patients, the perineal wounds healed fully without complications. Twenty-five patients underwent standard APR in 2010-2011 with primary closure of their perineal wounds. Ten out of 25(40 %) of patients who had undergone standard APR and primary closure of perineal wounds had major wound complications (p = 0.01). Our results suggest that after ELAPE the application of a negative pressure system to the perineal wound closed with biologic mesh may reduce perineal wound complications and may reduce the need for major perineal reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 631
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incisional negative pressure wound therapy to reduce perineal wound infection after abdominoperineal resection
    Kaneko, Tomoaki
    Funahashi, Kimihiko
    Ushigome, Mitstunori
    Kagami, Satoru
    Goto, Mayu
    Koda, Takamaru
    Kurihara, Akiharu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (01) : 103 - 111
  • [22] Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)
    Musters, Gijsbert D.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Bosker, Robbert J. I.
    Burger, Jacobus W. A.
    van Duijvendijk, Peter
    van Etten, Boudewijn
    van Geloven, Anna A. W.
    de Graaf, Eelco J. R.
    Hoff, Christiaan
    de Korte, Niels
    Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
    Rutten, Harm J. T.
    Singh, Baljit
    van de Ven, Anthony
    Vuylsteke, Ronald J. C. L. M.
    de Wilt, Johannes H. W.
    Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W.
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2014, 14
  • [23] Postoperative MRI Findings Following Conventional and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision in Low Rectal Cancer
    Oerskov, Kim Morgenstjerne
    Bondeven, Peter
    Laurberg, Soren
    Hagemann-Madsen, Rikke H.
    Christensen, Henrik Kidmose
    Lauridsen, Henrik
    Pedersen, Bodil Ginnerup
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [24] Outcomes of perineal wound closure techniques after abdominoperineal resections in rectal cancer: an NSQIP propensity score matched study
    Cataneo, Jose L.
    Mathis, Sydney A.
    del Valle, Diana D.
    Perez-Tamayo, Alejandra M.
    Mellgren, Anders F.
    Gantt, Gerald
    Alkureishi, Lee W. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2023, 57 (1-6) : 399 - 407
  • [25] Local control and survival after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for locally advanced or low rectal cancer
    Palmer, G.
    Anderin, C.
    Martling, A.
    Holm, T.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (07) : 527 - 532
  • [26] Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome
    Zhou, X.
    Sun, T.
    Xie, H.
    Zhang, Y.
    Zeng, H.
    Fu, W.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (06) : 474 - 481
  • [27] Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer—short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted
    Mattias Prytz
    Eva Angenete
    Jan Ekelund
    Eva Haglind
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29 : 981 - 987
  • [28] Results of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer including quality of life and long-term wound complications
    Welsch, Thilo
    Mategakis, Vyron
    Contin, Pietro
    Kulu, Yakup
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Ulrich, Alexis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 28 (04) : 503 - 510
  • [29] A new surgical approach of direct perineal wound full-thick closure for perineal wound of abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma: A prospective cohort trial
    Yang, Yong-Ping
    Yu, Ling-Yun
    Wang, Min
    Mu, Yu
    Li, Jian-Nan
    Shang, Feng-Jia
    Wu, Xian-Feng
    Liu, Tong-Jun
    Shi, Jian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (06) : 1817 - 1828
  • [30] Application of Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision in Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer
    Wang, Yan-Lei
    Dai, Yong
    Jiang, Jin-Bo
    Yuan, Hui-Yang
    Hu, San-Yuan
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (10) : 1340 - 1345