Breast augmentation: Part III-epreoperative considerations and planning

被引:19
作者
Berry, M. G. [1 ]
Cucchiara, V. [1 ]
Davies, D. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Welbeck Hosp, Inst Cosmet & Reconstruct Surg, London W1G 8EN, England
关键词
Breast augmentation; Biodimensional; Tissue-based planning; IMPLANT CORE; MAMMAPLASTY; SIZE; INCISION; ASYMMETRY; DEFORMITY; SELECTION; COVERAGE; SURGEONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2011.03.028
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The past four decades since the introduction of silicone mammary prostheses have seen significant improvements in their quality and durability. Advances in our understanding of the aetiopathology and prevention of adverse capsular contracture (ACC) have occurred such that surgical technique itself has now probably become the single most important determinant of both immediate and long-term outcome. Considered a simple, and in some quarters mindless, procedure it has evolved such that high-quality short-and stable long-term results are now expected. Whilst the fundamentals of breast augmentation (BA) remain, evolutionary philosophies confront today's surgeon with a wealth of options. Of fundamental importance has been the paradigm shift from a purely, or predominantly, volumetric, through biodimensional to a tissue-based approach. With BA, more than any other aesthetic procedure, possessing more variables, choice and influential external factors a thorough understanding of the myriad options available is essential. This review seeks to cover the key elements in obtaining an optimal primary result. It provides a rational basis for the selection of an option tailored to both the patient and the individual tissue characteristics in addition to the pertinent medicolegal issues. (c) 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1401 / 1409
页数:9
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] The Process of Breast Augmentation: Four Sequential Steps for Optimizing Outcomes for Patients
    Adams, William P., Jr.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (06) : 1892 - 1900
  • [2] Alpert Bernard S, 2008, Plast Reconstr Surg, V121, P1, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000305933.31540.5d
  • [3] Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years
    Bengtson, Bradley P.
    Van Natta, Bruce W.
    Murphy, Diane K.
    Slicton, Araceli
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 120 (07) : 40S - 48S
  • [4] Breast augmentation: Part I - a review of the silicone prosthesis
    Berry, M. G.
    Davies, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (11) : 1761 - 1768
  • [5] BERRY MG, 2010, J PLAST RECONST 0623
  • [6] AUGMENTATION MAMMAPLASTY - A REVIEW OF 18 YEARS
    BIGGS, TM
    CUKIER, J
    WORTHING, LF
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1982, 69 (03) : 445 - 450
  • [7] Blondeel PN, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V124, P372, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aeeb21
  • [8] Bricout N, 2005, Ann Chir Plast Esthet, V50, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.anplas.2005.08.004
  • [9] BREAST IMPLANT SIZE SELECTION AND PATIENT SATISFACTION
    BRODY, GS
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1981, 68 (04) : 611 - 613
  • [10] The perfect breast: Is it attainable? - Does it exist?
    Brody, GS
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (05) : 1500 - 1503