Development and validation of machine learning prediction model based on computed tomography angiography-derived hemodynamics for rupture status of intracranial aneurysms: a Chinese multicenter study

被引:46
作者
Chen, Guozhong [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Mengjie [1 ]
Shi, Zhao [1 ]
Xia, Shuang [3 ]
Ren, Yuan [4 ]
Liu, Zhen [4 ]
Liu, Xiuxian [4 ]
Li, Zhiyong [4 ]
Mao, Li [5 ]
Li, Xiu Li [5 ]
Zhang, Bo [6 ]
Zhang, Long Jiang [1 ]
Lu, Guang Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Jinling Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Med Sch, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Hosp 1, Dept Med Imaging, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin First Cent Hosp, Tianjin 300070, Peoples R China
[4] Southeast Univ, Sch Biol Sci & Med Engn, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[5] Deepwise AI Lab, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[6] Taizhou Peoples Hosp, Taizhou 225309, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Intracranial aneurysm; Tomography; X-ray computed; Machine learning; Angiography; Rupture; WALL SHEAR-STRESS; UNRUPTURED CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS; FLUID-DYNAMICS; RISK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-06886-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To build models based on conventional logistic regression (LR) and machine learning (ML) algorithms combining clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic information to predict individual rupture status of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), afterwards tested in internal and external validation datasets. Methods Patients with intracranial aneurysms diagnosed by computed tomography angiography and confirmed by invasive cerebral angiograph or clipping surgery were included. The prediction models were developed based on clinical, aneurysm morphological, and hemodynamic parameters by conventional LR and ML methods. Results The training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts were composed of 807 patients, 200 patients, and 108 patients, respectively. The area under curves (AUCs) of conventional LR models 1 (clinical), 2 (clinical and aneurysm morphological), and 3 (clinical, aneurysm morphological and hemodynamic characteristics) were 0.608, 0.765, and 0.886, respectively (all p < 0.05). The AUCs of ML models using random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and support vector machine (SVM) were 0.871, 0.851, and 0.863, respectively. There were no difference among AUCs of conventional LR, RF, and SVM (all p > 0.05/6), while the AUC of MLP was lower than that of conventional LR (p = 0.0055). Conclusion Hemodynamic parameters play an important role in the prediction performance of the models. ML methods cannot outperform conventional LR in prediction models for rupture status of UIAs integrating clinical, aneurysm morphological, and hemodynamic parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:5170 / 5182
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Big Data and Machine Learning in Health Care [J].
Beam, Andrew L. ;
Kohane, Isaac S. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (13) :1317-1318
[2]   Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial screening [J].
Brown, Robert D., Jr. ;
Broderick, Jrioseph P. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2014, 13 (04) :393-404
[3]   Association of Hemodynamic Factors With Intracranial Aneurysm Formation and Rupture: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Can, Anil ;
Du, Rose .
NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 78 (04) :510-519
[4]   Association of Hemodynamic Characteristics and Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture [J].
Cebral, J. R. ;
Mut, F. ;
Weir, J. ;
Putman, C. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (02) :264-270
[5]   A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models [J].
Christodoulou, Evangelia ;
Ma, Jie ;
Collins, Gary S. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Verbakel, Jan Y. ;
Van Calster, Ben .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 110 :12-22
[6]   Prediction of 30-Day All-Cause Readmissions in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure Comparison of Machine Learning and Other Statistical Approaches [J].
Frizzell, Jarrod D. ;
Liang, Li ;
Schulte, Phillip J. ;
Yancy, Clyde W. ;
Heidenreich, Paul A. ;
Hernandez, Adrian F. ;
Bhatt, Deepak L. ;
Fonarow, Gregg C. ;
Laskey, Warren K. .
JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (02) :204-209
[7]   Saccular intracranial aneurysm: pathology and mechanisms [J].
Frosen, Juhana ;
Tulamo, Riikka ;
Paetau, Anders ;
Laaksamo, Elisa ;
Korja, Miikka ;
Laakso, Aki ;
Niemela, Mika ;
Hernesniemi, Juha .
ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA, 2012, 123 (06) :773-786
[8]   Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies [J].
Greving, Jacoba P. ;
Wermer, Marieke J. H. ;
Brown, Robert D., Jr. ;
Morita, Akio ;
Juvela, Seppo ;
Yonekura, Masahiro ;
Ishibashi, Toshihiro ;
Torner, James C. ;
Nakayama, Takeo ;
Rinke, Gabriel J. E. ;
Algra, Ale .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2014, 13 (01) :59-66
[9]   Wall Shear Stress on Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms at the Internal Carotid Artery [J].
Jou, L. -D. ;
Lee, D. H. ;
Morsi, H. ;
Mawad, M. E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2008, 29 (09) :1761-1767
[10]   Machine Learning Application for Rupture Risk Assessment in Small-Sized Intracranial Aneurysm [J].
Kim, Heung Cheol ;
Rhim, Jong Kook ;
Ahn, Jun Hyong ;
Park, Jeong Jin ;
Moon, Jong Un ;
Hong, Eun Pyo ;
Kim, Mi Ran ;
Kim, Seung Gyu ;
Lee, Seong Hwan ;
Jeong, Jae Hoon ;
Choi, Sung Won ;
Jeon, Jin Pyeong .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (05)