Self-reported waist circumference compared with the 'Waist Watcher' tape-measure to identify individuals at increased health risk through intra-abdominal fat accumulation

被引:45
作者
Han, TS
Lean, MEJ
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Royal Infirm, Dept Human Nutr, Glasgow G31 2ER, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Cambridge Wolfson Coll, Cambridge CB3 9BB, England
关键词
abdominal fat distribution; health promotion; waist circumference;
D O I
10.1017/S0007114598001809
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
We evaluated the accuracy of self-reported home-assessed and self-measured waist circumference in 101 men and eighty-three women aged 28-67 years. The main outcome measures were subjects' self-reported and self-measured waist circumference, and self-classification according to the previously defined waist action level 1 (940 mm in men, 800 mm in women) and action level 2 (1020 mm in men, 880 mm in women), and waist circumference measured by the investigator using the 'Waist Watcher' tape-measure, as the reference method. The mean errors (95 % CI limits of agreement) for subjects' self-reported waist circumference (self-reported minus reference; mm) were -67 (95 % CI -210, 77) in men and -43 (95 % CI -211,123) in women, and for self-measured waist circumference (mm) using the 'Waist Watcher' (self-measured minus reference) were -5 (95 % CI -62, 52) in men and -43 (95 % CI -50, 42) in women. The proportions of subjects classified into waist action level 1 or action level 2 by the investigator were used as the reference method. Self-reported waist circumference of men and women respectively would be classified correctly in different categories based on action level 1 with sensitivities of 58.3 and 78.7 %, and specificities of 92.5 and 91.7 %, and action level 2 with sensitivities of 35.3 and 44.9 %, and specificities of 98.5 and 90.7 %. Using the 'Waist Watcher' with different colour bands based on the action levels, male and female subjects respectively classified themselves into correct categories according to action level 1 with sensitivities of 100 and 95.7 %, and specificities of 95 1 and 97.2 %, and according to action level 2 with sensitivities of 97.1 and 100 %, and specificities of 100 % for both sexes. Only 2 % of the sample misclassified themselves into the wrong categories according to waist circumference action levels. In conclusion, people tend to underestimate their waist circumference, but the 'Waist Watcher' tape-measure offers advantages over self-reported home-assessed measurement, and may be used as a screening tool for self-classifying the risk of ill health through intra-abdominal fat accumulation.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, PHYS STAT UINT ANT
[2]  
Armitage P., 1971, STAT METHODS MED RES
[3]   Obesity [J].
Bjorntorp, P .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9075) :423-426
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]  
Carey VJ, 1997, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V145, P614, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009158
[6]  
CRAWLEY HF, 1995, INT J OBESITY, V19, P579
[7]  
EGGER G, 1995, INT J OBESITY S2, V19
[8]  
FERRARIO M, 1995, INT J OBESITY, V19, P449
[9]  
*GERM SOC OB RES, 1995, ADIPOSITAS, V9, P6
[10]  
HALL TR, 1989, INT J OBESITY, V13, P801