Efficient 3D modeling of damage in composite materials

被引:36
作者
El-Sisi, Alaa El-Din A. [1 ]
El-Emam, Hesham M. [1 ]
Salim, Hani A. [1 ]
Sallam, Hossam El-Din M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Jazan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
关键词
3D progressive damage; degradation; composites; finite element; ANSYS; USERMAT; PROGRESSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES; MECHANICS; CRITERIA; JOINTS;
D O I
10.1177/0021998314525983
中图分类号
TB33 [复合材料];
学科分类号
摘要
Due to the complexity of composite material, numerical methods are generally utilized in their analysis and design. Commercial finite element (FE) codes, such as ANSYS and ABAQUS, allow the implementation of user subroutines in the program, which provides the advantage of using high meshing and solving technologies besides the improvement of materials and/or elements models. Nonlinearities arise for many engineering problems, for example, the progressive damage of a composite element that contains sources of stress concentration or damage localization such as holes, bolts, and/or flaws causes nonlinear material behavior. In order to simulate this nonlinear behavior, especially in 3D, an accurate material constitutive model is required. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to simulate the 3D progressive damage model of composite materials by using simple numerical models. In this paper, ANSYS user subroutine (USERMAT) was used to simulate the progressive damage behavior of a composite plate containing holes using simple models. Three different material models were used: ply discount model (PDM), simple progressive damage model (SPDM) by adding an empirical progressive damage criteria to the PDM, and continuum damage mechanics model (CDMM). Good agreements were observed between SPDM, CDMM, and published experimental results. Furthermore, CDMM showed the least dependence on mesh size. Three different damage evolution laws, linear, quadratic, and degradation laws, were adjusted and tested. It was found that there was no significant difference in the predicted failure load between these selected laws.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 828
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Ansys Inc, 2012, ANSYS REL 14 5 DOC
[2]  
Barbero E.J., 2013, Finite Element Analysis of Composite Materials using Abaqus, DOI [DOI 10.1201/B14788, DOI 10.1201/B16295]
[3]  
Barbero E.J., 2010, Introduction to Composite Materials Design, V2nd
[4]  
Bazant Z., 1983, Materiaux et Constructions, V16, P155, DOI 10.1007/BF02486267
[5]   A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates [J].
Camanho, PP ;
Matthews, FL .
JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 1999, 33 (24) :2248-2280
[6]   Three-dimensional failure criteria for fiber-reinforced laminates [J].
Catalanotti, G. ;
Camanho, P. P. ;
Marques, A. T. .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2013, 95 :63-79
[7]  
Chen J, 2009, 18 INT C COMP MAT ED
[8]   A combined elastoplastic damage model for progressive failure analysis of composite materials and structures [J].
Chen, J. F. ;
Morozov, E. V. ;
Shankar, K. .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2012, 94 (12) :3478-3489
[9]   Failure of composite materials [J].
Daniel, I. M. .
STRAIN, 2007, 43 (01) :4-12
[10]   BEHAVIOR OF COMPOSITE LAMINATES AFTER INITIAL FAILURES [J].
HAHN, HT ;
TSAI, SW .
JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 1974, 8 (JUL) :288-305