Seeing Dogs: Human Preferences for Dog Physical Attributes

被引:50
作者
Hecht, Julie [1 ]
Horowitz, Alexandra [2 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Barnard Coll, Dept Psychol, New York, NY USA
来源
ANTHROZOOS | 2015年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
aesthetic preference; anthropomorphism; dogs; Kindchenschema; physical characteristics; FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS; INFANT FACES; BABY SCHEMA; CUTENESS; BEAUTY; ANTHROPOMORPHISM; AVERAGENESS; PERCEPTION; SELECTION; PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.2752/089279315X14129350722217
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This study systematically investigated peoples' preferences for dog physical attributes in images of real-life dogs. Participants (n = 124) completed an aesthetic-preference test wherein they viewed 80 image pairs of mixed-breed adult dogs and were asked which image they "liked best." In each image pair, the two dog images appeared to be nearly identical, but unbeknownst to participants, the images differed slightly in that one physical characteristic had been manipulated. By altering a single physical characteristic in each image pair, participant preference for each of 14 different physical attributes could be investigated over the course of the study. The feature manipulations examined theories relating to Kindchenschema (an infantile appearance, per Konrad Lorenz), ostensive human similarity the process of domestication, as well as differences in attribute size and symmetry. The results showed that participants preferred some features associated with the infant schema large eyes and wider-set eyes. They also preferred certain human-like attributes: colored irises and a distinct upturn of the commissure, seeming to capture a smile. By contrast, participants did not reveal a preference for physical characteristics relating to feature size, symmetry or the process of domestication. The findings suggest that identifiable physical attributes of domestic dogs have aesthetic value and, additionally, that human preferences for aesthetic differences can be systematically investigated. Given that people attend to and care about the way dogs look, the effects of particular physical attributes on peoples' preferences merit investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 163
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Visual Aesthetics and Human Preference [J].
Palmer, Stephen E. ;
Schloss, Karen B. ;
Sammartino, Jonathan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 :77-107
[32]   Personality characteristics of dog and cat persons [J].
Perrine, RM ;
Osbourne, HL .
ANTHROZOOS, 1998, 11 (01) :33-40
[33]   The effects of social training and other factors on adoption success of shelter dogs [J].
Protopopova, Alexandra ;
Gilmour, Amanda Joy ;
Weiss, Rebecca Hannah ;
Shen, Jacqueline Yontsye ;
Wynne, Clive David Lawrence .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2012, 142 (1-2) :61-68
[34]   The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty [J].
Rhodes, G .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 57 :199-226
[35]   Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty [J].
Rhodes, G ;
Yoshikawa, S ;
Clark, A ;
Lee, K ;
McKay, R ;
Akamatsu, S .
PERCEPTION, 2001, 30 (05) :611-625
[36]   Do dogs resemble their owners? [J].
Roy, MM ;
Christenfeld, NJS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (05) :361-363
[37]   UNDERSTANDING DOGS - CARETAKERS ATTRIBUTIONS OF MINDEDNESS IN CANINE-HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS [J].
SANDERS, CR .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ETHNOGRAPHY, 1993, 22 (02) :205-226
[38]   Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection - Beyond the "cute response" [J].
Serpell, JA .
SOCIETY & ANIMALS, 2003, 11 (01) :83-100
[39]   Cuteness and Disgust: The Humanizing and Dehumanizing Effects of Emotion [J].
Sherman, Gary D. ;
Haidt, Jonathan .
EMOTION REVIEW, 2011, 3 (03) :245-251
[40]   The Cutest Little Baby Face: A Hormonal Link to Sensitivity to Cuteness in Infant Faces [J].
Sprengelmeyer, R. ;
Perrett, D. I. ;
Fagan, E. C. ;
Cornwell, R. E. ;
Lobmaier, J. S. ;
Sprengelmeyer, A. ;
Aasheim, H. B. M. ;
Black, I. M. ;
Cameron, L. M. ;
Crow, S. ;
Milne, N. ;
Rhodes, E. C. ;
Young, A. W. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (02) :149-154