Carbon stock and its relationships with tree diversity and density in community forests in Nepal

被引:20
作者
Aryal, S. [1 ]
Shrestha, S. [2 ]
Maraseni, T. [1 ]
Wagle, P. C. [3 ]
Gaire, N. P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Inst Agr & Environm, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Tribhuvan Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Padma Kanya Multiple Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal
[3] Tribhuvan Univ, Trichandra Multiple Coll, Kathmandu, Nepal
[4] NAST, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal
关键词
carbon stock; density; diversity; community forest; elevation; Nepal; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MANAGEMENT REGIMES; SPECIES RICHNESS; TROPICAL FOREST; CLIMATE; STORAGE; BIODIVERSITY; GRADIENT; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1505/146554818824063069
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Several forest management and conservation models exist throughout the world and Nepal is one of the pioneering countries to implement a community forestry programme. Studying the relationship between carbon stocks and biodiversity is important in understanding the trade-off between two major benefits of forest ecosystems, and working towards achieving the optimum balance between them. This study aims to: (i) estimate the biomass and total carbon stock in community forests, (ii) explore the relationship between carbon stocks and the diversity and density of trees, and (iii) examine that relationship in relation to the elevation of the community forest. The study covers all the components of forest carbon including above- and below-ground, and soil carbon. The biomass in the forest was found to be 299.20 tons/ha whereas the total carbon stock (including soil carbon) was found to be 162.95 tons/ha. Total carbon and biomass carbon were negatively related to the diversity and the density of trees. However, soil carbon was positively related to these factors. The results of the study can contribute to revising community forest management policies and helping to increase forest carbon and biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 273
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Acharya K. P., 2004, Journal of Forest and Livelihood, V4, P44
[2]  
Acharya K. P., 2006, BANKO JANAKARI, V16, P46
[3]   Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal [J].
Acharya, KP .
INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2002, 4 (02) :149-156
[4]   Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Ostrom, E .
POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2001, 29 (04) :485-514
[5]   Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities [J].
Anderson, Barbara J. ;
Armsworth, Paul R. ;
Eigenbrod, Felix ;
Thomas, Chris D. ;
Gillings, Simon ;
Heinemeyer, Andreas ;
Roy, David B. ;
Gaston, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2009, 46 (04) :888-896
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WHAT FUT REF PROGR S
[7]  
ANSAB/FECOFUN/ICIMOD, 2010, FOR CARB STOCKS MEAS, P69
[8]  
Anup K. C., 2013, International Journal of Environmental Protection, V3, P33
[9]   Comparison of Carbon Stocks Between Mixed and Pine-Dominated Forest Stands Within the Gwalinidaha Community Forest in Lalitpur District, Nepal [J].
Aryal, Suman ;
Bhattarai, Dilli R. ;
Devkota, Rohini P. .
SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2013, 12 (04) :659-666
[10]   Can Rapoport's rule explain tree species richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient, Nepal? [J].
Bhattarai, Khem Raj ;
Vetaas, Ole R. .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2006, 12 (04) :373-378