Using an extended logarithmic mean Divisia index approach to assess the roles of economic factors on industrial CO2 emissions of China

被引:115
作者
Wang, Miao [1 ]
Feng, Chao [2 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Management, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Decomposition analysis; Investment; R&D expenditure; Five-Year Plan; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; LMDI DECOMPOSITION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CARBON EMISSIONS; DRIVING FORCES; REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS; CEMENT INDUSTRY; PANEL-DATA; GROWTH; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.10.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper used an extended logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) approach to decompose the changes of China's industrial CO2 emissions into four traditional factors and three investment and R&D expenditure related factors, including: carbon dioxide emissions coefficient effect, energy structure effect, energy intensity effect, R&D efficiency effect, R&D intensity effect, investment intensity effect, and industrial activity effect. The results show that: (1) industrial activity was the largest stimulating factor in industrial CO2 emissions. Investment intensity and R&D intensity changes displayed overall positive effects in emissions growth but with some fluctuations in different periods and provinces. (2) Energy intensity was the prominent factor to facilitate emissions reduction, followed by the R&D efficiency. The two factors contributed to a considerable decrease in industrial CO2 emissions. (3) Among all factors, energy structure effect was the weakest, and showed alternative influencing directions in different periods and provinces. (4) The effects exerted from various factors were distinctly varied in different economic stages and provinces. And generally, the curbing effects cannot counteract the promoting effects. Finally, the empirical results show that continue to decrease energy intensity, facilitate the investment and R&D efforts aiming at energy-saving and emission-reduction, and reduce the reliance on coal while further raise the renewable energy utilization are beneficial to alleviate industrial CO2 emissions. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 114
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Comparison of energy intensities in European Union countries.: Results of a structural decomposition analysis [J].
Alcántara, V ;
Duarte, R .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (02) :177-189
[2]   The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (07) :867-871
[3]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[4]   Perfect decomposition techniques in energy and environmental analysis [J].
Ang, BW ;
Liu, FL ;
Chew, EP .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (14) :1561-1566
[5]   Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition [J].
Ang, BW ;
Zhang, FQ ;
Choi, KH .
ENERGY, 1998, 23 (06) :489-495
[6]   A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies [J].
Ang, BW ;
Zhang, FQ .
ENERGY, 2000, 25 (12) :1149-1176
[7]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY J
[8]   The energy intensity in Lithuania during 1995-2009: A LMDI approach [J].
Balezentis, Alvydas ;
Balezentis, Tomas ;
Streimikiene, Dalia .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (11) :7322-7334
[9]   Defining the rebound effect [J].
Berkhout, PHG ;
Muskens, JC ;
Velthuijsen, JW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :425-432
[10]   Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? [J].
Binswanger, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (01) :119-132