Source shot noise mitigation in focused ion beam microscopy by time-resolved measurement

被引:11
作者
Peng, Minxu [1 ]
Murray-Bruce, John [3 ]
Berggren, Karl K. [2 ]
Goyal, Vivek K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Compound Poisson distributions; Electron microscopy; Fisher information; Helium ion microscopy; Neyman Type A distribution; Source shot noise; DISTRIBUTIONS; RESOLUTION; EMISSION; LIMITS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.112948
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
Focused ion beam microscopy suffers from source shot noise - random variation in the number of incident ions in any fixed dwell time - along with random variation in the number of detected secondary electrons per incident ion. This multiplicity of sources of randomness increases the variance of the measurements and thus worsens the trade-off between incident ion dose and image accuracy. Repeated measurement with low dwell time, without changing the total ion dose, is a way to introduce time resolution to this form of microscopy. Through theoretical analyses and Monte Carlo simulations, we show that three ways to process time-resolved measurements result in mean-squared error (MSE) improvements compared to the conventional method of having no time resolution. In particular, maximum likelihood estimation provides reduction in MSE or reduction in required dose by a multiplicative factor approximately equal to the secondary electron yield. This improvement factor is similar to complete mitigation of source shot noise. Experiments with a helium ion microscope are consistent with the analyses and suggest accuracy improvement for a fixed source dose by a factor of about 4.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Simulation of ion imaging: Sputtering, contrast, noise
    Castaldo, V.
    Hagen, C. W.
    Kruit, P.
    [J]. ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2011, 111 (08) : 982 - 994
  • [2] On the influence of the sputtering in determining the resolution of a scanning ion microscope
    Castaldo, V.
    Hagen, C. W.
    Kruit, P.
    van Veldhoven, E.
    Maas, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2009, 27 (06): : 3196 - 3202
  • [3] Sputtering limits versus signal-to-noise limits in the observation of Sn balls in a Ga+ microscope
    Castaldo, V.
    Hagen, C. W.
    Rieger, B.
    Kruit, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2008, 26 (06): : 2107 - 2115
  • [4] Calculated influence of work function on SE escape probability and Secondary Electron Emission yield
    Cazaux, Jacques
    [J]. APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2010, 257 (03) : 1002 - 1009
  • [5] On the Lambert W function
    Corless, RM
    Gonnet, GH
    Hare, DEG
    Jeffrey, DJ
    Knuth, DE
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS, 1996, 5 (04) : 329 - 359
  • [6] 2-PHOTON LASER SCANNING FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY
    DENK, W
    STRICKLER, JH
    WEBB, WW
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1990, 248 (4951) : 73 - 76
  • [7] The history and development of the helium ion microscope
    Economou, Nicholas P.
    Notte, John A.
    Thompson, William B.
    [J]. SCANNING, 2012, 34 (02) : 83 - 89
  • [8] Helium ion microscopy of graphene: beam damage, image quality and edge contrast
    Fox, D.
    Zhou, Y. B.
    O'Neill, A.
    Kumar, S.
    Wang, J. J.
    Coleman, J. N.
    Duesberg, G. S.
    Donegan, J. F.
    Zhang, H. Z.
    [J]. NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 24 (33)
  • [9] Hakamata T., 2007, Photomultiplier Tubes: Principle and Applications, V3a
  • [10] Jia HP, 2018, 2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND SAFETY (ICSRS), P62, DOI [10.1109/ICSRS.2018.00019, 10.1109/ICSRS.2018.8688837]